Back

Incidence and Outcomes of Atrial Arrhythmia with CDK4/6 Inhibitors in HR-Positive / HER2-Negative Breast Cancer

Davis, N. E.; Herrmann, J.; Hodge, D. O.; Blumenfeld, S.; Tan, N. Y. L.

2025-08-05 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2025.08.01.25332600 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundCyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors are increasingly used in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-) breast cancer, yet emerging data suggest potential cardiotoxicity, including atrial arrhythmias (AA). Understanding the incidence and outcomes of AA in this population is essential as indications for CDK4/6 inhibitors expand. ObjectivesTo evaluate the incidence of new-onset AA and associated outcomes in patients with HR+/HER2- breast cancer treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients treated at Mayo Clinic from 2015- 2024 who received CDK4/6 inhibitors for HR+/HER2- breast cancer. The primary outcome was incidence of AA (atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, or atrial tachycardia). Secondary outcomes included cerebrovascular events and all-cause mortality. Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox regression models were used to assess outcomes and associated risk factors. ResultsAmong 2,782 patients, 59% received palbociclib, 28% abemaciclib, and 14% ribociclib. New-onset AA occurred in 45, with cumulative incidence at 5 years of 2.8%. No significant differences in AA incidence were observed between agents (p=0.44). Multivariate analysis identified age at treatment as the only independent predictor of AA (HR 1.073, p<0.001). Four patients with new-onset AA experienced cerebrovascular events. New-onset AA was associated with increased mortality (HR 1.56, p=0.012). ConclusionsCDK4/6 inhibitor therapy was associated with a low but clinically significant risk of new-onset AA, which in turn is associated with increased mortality. There was no significant difference in new-onset AA risk between different individual CDK4/6 inhibitor agents. Prospective studies are needed to define mechanisms and guide monitoring strategies.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.