Back

Video-Based Pelvic Floor Muscle Therapy for Adult Patients with Pelvic Floor Disorders: A Protocol for a Prospective Single-Arm Interventional Pilot and Feasibility Study

Linhares, S. M.; D'Aquila, M.; Schultz, K. S.; Mongiu, A. K.

2025-08-02 surgery
10.1101/2025.08.01.25332599 medRxiv
Show abstract

The number of patients who suffer from pelvic floor disorders increases with age and can have a significant impact on quality of life. The first-line treatment for these different disorders includes pelvic floor rehabilitation. However, there are high rates of non-compliance with completing the recommended duration of treatment due to delays in appointments and time constraints. Thus, the primary goal of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of an online 8-week video-based pelvic floor muscle therapy program. A secondary goal is determining whether the treatment can improve quality of life and symptoms. This study is a registry-based pilot single-arm prospective trial (NCT06689891: Video-Based Pelvic Floor Muscle Therapy). Eligible participants will be offered the online program as an alternative to in-person pelvic floor rehabilitation. Primary timepoints include a pre-intervention in-person visit with a licensed pelvic floor therapist and the 8-week video-based pelvic floor muscle therapy program. There will be a midpoint evaluation followed by a post-intervention visit with the same pelvic floor therapist, where participants will be graded on their ability to complete the various exercises to assess efficacy. A survey assessing the online-based programs usability will be conducted post-intervention. Patient-reported outcome measures, including quality-of-life and symptom changes, will be collected pre-, mid-, and post-intervention. As this is a pilot trial, the goal is to establish the acceptability and feasibility of a video-based pelvic floor muscle therapy program as an alternative to in-person treatment.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.