Back

Left Atrial Stiffness Identifies Children with Magnetic-Resonance-Imaging-Proven Acute Myocarditis Despite Preserved Left Ventricular Systolic Function

Numata, R.; Calderon-Anyosa, R. J.; Vaiyani, D.; Sun, S.; Wang, Y.; Mercer-Rosa, L.; Biko, D. M.; Banerjee, A.

2025-08-03 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2025.08.01.25332594
Show abstract

BackgroundLeft atrium (LA) may be labeled as a "forgotten" chamber in echocardiographic evaluation of pediatric myocarditis. Recently, LA stiffness has gained attention in identifying both diastolic dysfunction and myocardial injury in children. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 51 pediatric patients with acute myocarditis diagnosed by cardiac MRI based on updated Lake-Louise-Criteria, along with 40 age-matched healthy controls. Only patients with preserved LVEF (>55%) were included, given their increased risk of adverse outcomes due to diastolic impairment. Follow-up imaging was available for 41 of the 51 patients. LV systolic and diastolic function, and LA strain were evaluated by conventional 2D and speckle-tracking echocardiography. LA stiffness was calculated as the ratio of E/e to peak LA strain as depicted in following equation: O_FD O_INLINEFIG[Formula]C_INLINEFIGC_FD ResultsLA stiffness was significantly increased in myocarditis patients (0.27 {+/-} 0.09 vs. 0.15 {+/-} 0.04 %-1, p<0.001) and remained impaired at early follow-up. LA stiffness showed the best correlation with peak BNP (r = 0.66, p<0.001). Moreover, LA stiffness had the highest diagnostic performance among all echocardiographic indices, with an AUC of 0.94, and remained an independent diagnostic power in multivariable regression model (OR 1.58 [95% CI: 1.32 - 1.89], p<0.001). When it was incorporated into a composite score with LV peak longitudinal strain, the AUC yielded the highest with 98% sensitivity. ConclusionAn optimal LA stiffness cutoff of 0.2%-1 may provide incremental value as a new diagnostic marker for the diagnosis of acute myocarditis with preserved LVEF in children, when this value is exceeded. Clinical PerspectiveO_ST_ABSWhat Is New?C_ST_ABSO_LIWe evaluated the diagnostic utility of left atrial (LA) stiffness in pediatric patients with acute myocarditis and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), using both conventional and two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography. C_LIO_LILA stiffness was significantly elevated alongside reduced peak LA strain in pediatric myocarditis patients confirmed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR), even during early follow-up, reflecting persistent left ventricular diastolic dysfunction. C_LIO_LILA stiffness demonstrated the highest diagnostic accuracy in distinguishing patients with acute myocarditis from normal control, with an AUC of 0.94 (cutoff of 0.2%-1), and incorporating it with LV longitudinal strain enhanced the diagnostic performance. C_LI What Are The Clinical Implications?O_LILA strain analysis may play a pivotal role in helping clinicians identify diastolic dysfunction and detect pediatric patients with CMR-proven acute myocarditis, even with preserved LVEF, facilitating early diagnosis and support tailored management during follow-up. C_LI

Matching journals

1
European Heart Journal
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 14 published papers
#1
65× avg
2
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Frontiers Media SA · based on 33 published papers
Top 1%
28× avg
3
Journal of the American Heart Association
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 92 published papers
Top 4%
9.7× avg
4
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 25%
7.4%
5
Circulation
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 37 published papers
Top 2%
21× avg
6
The American Journal of Cardiology
Elsevier BV · based on 15 published papers
Top 0.7%
38× avg
7
BMJ Open
BMJ · based on 553 published papers
Top 25%
4.4%
8
International Journal of Cardiology
Elsevier BV · based on 13 published papers
Top 1%
27× avg
9
Frontiers in Pediatrics
Frontiers Media SA · based on 24 published papers
Top 1%
21× avg
10
Journal of Clinical Medicine
MDPI AG · based on 77 published papers
Top 5%
4.7× avg
11
Heart Rhythm
Elsevier BV · based on 16 published papers
Top 1%
18× avg
12
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 30 published papers
Top 2%
11× avg
13
Circulation: Heart Failure
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 11 published papers
Top 0.8%
31× avg
14
Nature Communications
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 483 published papers
Top 27%
2.3%
15
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Elsevier BV · based on 11 published papers
Top 0.7%
27× avg
16
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 15 published papers
Top 2%
12× avg
17
Heart
BMJ · based on 10 published papers
Top 2%
18× avg
18
Medicine
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 29 published papers
Top 6%
3.7× avg
19
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 137 published papers
Top 11%
2.1× avg
20
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 11 published papers
Top 4%
7.8× avg
21
European Respiratory Journal
European Respiratory Society (ERS) · based on 44 published papers
Top 6%
2.5× avg
22
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 97%
0.7%
23
Open Heart
BMJ · based on 18 published papers
Top 5%
3.5× avg
24
BMC Medicine
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 155 published papers
Top 26%
0.7%
25
EBioMedicine
Elsevier BV · based on 21 published papers
Top 3%
6.3× avg
26
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 166 published papers
Top 13%
0.7%
27
eLife
eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd · based on 262 published papers
Top 35%
0.7%