Back

Molecular evolution of terpene synthase underlying the diversification of isoprene emission in Fagaceae

Ikezaki, Y.; Kudo, S. N.; Nakata, T.; Koita, S.; Munakata, R.; Yazaki, K.; Torimaru, T.; Tomaru, N.; Isobe, S.; Hirakawa, H.; Kusumi, J.; Satake, A.

2025-07-31 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2025.07.31.667835 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Plants emit a wide range of volatile organic compounds, among which isoprene is the most abundant and atmospherically influential. Although oak species are major contributors to isoprene emission, there is considerable variation in isoprene emission capacity within the Fagaceae family. To unravel the evolutionary origins of isoprene emission, we investigated the molecular evolution of terpene synthase (TPS) genes across eight species within the Fagaceae. We identified a Fagaceae-specific TPS-b subclade in which potential isoprene synthase (IspS) activity evolved independently in two gene lineages within subgenus Quercus. Ancestral sequence reconstruction revealed that the acquisition of a diagnostic amino acid residue for IspS function arose convergently in these lineages and was subject to positive selection, suggesting adaptive evolution. Ancestral-enzyme assays targeting the gene lineage with high gene expression revealed that the early protein primarily produced monoterpenes from geranyl diphosphate (GPP), whereas their descendants shifted substrate preference to dimethylallyl diphosphate (DMAPP), evolving into dedicated isoprene synthases. Our results indicate that IspS activity was not ancestral in Fagaceae, but evolved approximately 56 million years ago within the subgenus Quercus, and has been retained ever since. These findings emphasize the roles of enzyme structural innovation and regulatory shifts in the diversification of volatile terpenoid biosynthesis.

Published in Plant Biology · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.