Back

Burn-induced decreases in soil microbial carbon use efficiency vary across soil types and substrates

Johnson, D.; Yedinak, K.; Whitman, T.

2025-08-02 ecology
10.1101/2025.07.31.667753 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Wildfires cause immediate changes in above and belowground carbon (C) stocks in boreal forest ecosystems with long-term repercussions for C cycling. Understanding the role of soil microbes in mediating post-fire C cycling and recovery is an important step to predicting how these ecosystems will respond to novel wildfire regimes caused by climate change. Wildfires can cause large shifts in soil bacterial and fungal community composition that can persist for years post-fire. Less is known about the effects of fire on soil microbial community function, such as C use efficiency (CUE). In this study, we measured the effects of burning on substrate-specific CUE using a laboratory incubation of boreal forest soils. We amended burned and unburned soils with either 13C-labelled ground pine roots or glucose and measured the amount of added substrate C that was incorporated into microbial biomass C versus respired as CO2 in order to calculate CUE. Burning caused a decrease in the amount of soil microbial biomass and respiration derived from soil organic C. Glucose-specific CUE declined with burning, driven by a decrease in glucose-derived microbial biomass. This decrease in glucose-specific CUE following burning correlated with an increase in weighted mean predicted 16S rRNA gene copy number, raising the possibility of using copy number as a proxy for post-fire CUE in boreal forest soils. Overall, pine-specific CUE was lower than glucose-specific CUE, likely reflecting the difference in chemical complexity between the two substrates; burning had a much smaller effect on pine-specific CUE, highlighting the variability of CUE between substrates in burned soils.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Soil Biology and Biochemistry
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.5%
2
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.8%
3
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
6.5%
4
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
5
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 20%
4.3%
6
Communications Earth & Environment
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
7
Journal of Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
8
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.7%
10
Ecology
70 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
11
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
12
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
13
Journal of Environmental Management
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
14
Global Ecology and Biogeography
41 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
15
GeoHealth
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.1%
17
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.1%
18
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.0%
19
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
20
The ISME Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
21
Ecosphere
53 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
22
ISME Communications
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
Ecological Monographs
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
24
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
25
Nature Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
26
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
27
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
28
Plant and Soil
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
29
Ecological Indicators
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
30
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%