Combination of heart failure and atrial fibrillation worsens ethnicity-related disparity: An individual patient-level meta-analysis of randomised trials
Champsi, A.; Fox, S. J.; Hardy, E. J.; Bunting, K. V.; Rosano, G.; Boehm, M.; Flather, M. D.; Kotecha, D.; carAIc group, ; Beta-blockers in Heart Failure Collaborative Group,
Show abstract
AimsEthnicity is known to influence patient outcomes and treatment efficacy, but knowledge is limited how multimorbidity interacts with clinical events, for example when heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) combine. Methods and Results16,713 patients were included from 12 randomized placebo-controlled trials in HF (11 versus beta-blockers and 1 versus spironolactone), of which 13,568 patients (81.2%) were in sinus rhythm and 3,145 (18.8%) had comorbid AF at baseline. Non-white ethnicity was recorded in 1,899 (11%), with these patients being younger (median age 58 versus 67 years) and suffering higher rates of diabetes, hypertension, and lower left-ventricular ejection fraction (median 25% versus 30%) than those of white ethnicity. During median follow-up of 1.4 years (IQR 0.8-2.3), the primary outcome of all-cause mortality occurred in 394 (21%) non-white patients and 2,142 (15%) white patients, with confounder-adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.36, 95% CI 1.20-1.54; p<0.001. The impact of ethnicity on death was greater in patients with coexisting HF and AF (non-white versus white HR 2.05; 95% CI 1.55-2.70; p<0.001) than in those with HF in sinus rhythm (HR 1.24; 95% CI 1.08-1.41; p=0.002). The interaction p-value was 0.003, and confirmed using propensity-score matching to account for baseline differences (p=0.009). Similar disparities for the combination of ethnicity and comorbidity were seen for the secondary outcomes cardiovascular and HF-related death, and cardiovascular and HF-related hospitalisation. ConclusionNon-white patients with HF suffer from substantially higher rates of death, and comorbid AF leads to significant worsening of this ethnicity-related disparity.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Arrhythmia and Survival Outcomes among Black and White Patients with a Primary Prevention Defibrillator 97%
- Screening for Atrial Fibrillation in Older Adults at Primary Care Visits: the VITAL-AF Randomized Controlled Trial 94%
- Aptamer Proteomics for Biomarker Discovery in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical presentation, disease course and outcome of COVID-19 in hospitalized patients with and without pre-existing cardiac disease – a cohort study across sixteen countries 95%
- Right Ventricular Dysfunction: An Overlooked Predictor of Sudden Cardiac Death and Arrhythmic Events -- A Meta-Analysis 94%
- Hypoferremia reduces long-term risk of major adverse cardiovascular events after STEMI by averting the myocardial reactive iron storm 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- High Variability of Body Mass Index Independently Associated with Incident Heart Failure 95%
- Development and validation of imaging-free myocardial fibrosis prediction models, association with outcomes, and sample size estimation for phase 3 trials 95%
- Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonism Reduces Atrial Arrhythmias Post-Cardiac Surgery and Attenuates Atrial Stress Responses to Cardioplegic Arrest 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Inequalities in access to and outcomes of cardiac surgery in England: retrospective analysis of Hospital Episode Statistics (2010-2019) 93%
- Pacemaker implantation after cardiac surgery: a contemporary, nationwide perspective 92%
- Evaluation of antithrombotic use and COVID-19 outcomes in a nationwide atrial fibrillation cohort 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.