Unjustified Poisson assumptions lead to overconfident estimates of the effective reproductive number
Nemcova, B.; Goldstein, I. H.; Sebastian, J.; Minin, V. M.; Bracher, J.
Show abstract
Time-varying effective reproductive numbers of infectious diseases are commonly estimated using renewal equation models. In the widely applied R package EpiEstim and various related tools, this approach is combined with a Poisson distributional assumption. This has been criticized on various occasions, mostly on grounds of general model realism or a desire to estimate overdispersion parameters. Here we argue that an important issue arising from the Poisson assumption is that inference about the effective reproductive number becomes overconfident in presence of overdispersion. By how much standard errors are underestimated follows in a straightforward manner from theory on generalized linear models. We therefore recommend to replace the Poisson assumption by quasi-Poisson or negative binomial extensions, and contrast their respective properties. We illustrate our arguments in detailed simulation studies and three examples of case studies of Ebola, pandemic influenza and COVID-19.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Why are different estimates of the effective reproductive number so different? A case study on COVID-19 in Germany 96%
- Scalable gradients enable Hamiltonian Monte Carlo sampling for phylodynamic inference under episodic birth-death-sampling models 95%
- EpiLPS: a fast and flexible Bayesian tool for near real-time estimation of the time-varying reproduction number 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- An R t - based model for predicting multiple epidemic waves in a heterogeneous population 95%
- Estimation of the probability of epidemic fade-out from multiple outbreak data 94%
- A simulation-based approach for estimating the time-dependent reproduction number from temporally aggregated disease incidence time series data 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A bivariate zero-inflated negative binomial model and its applications to biomedical settings 94%
- Fitting to the UK COVID-19 outbreak, short-term forecasts and estimating the reproductive number 92%
- Tight Fit of the SIR Dynamic Epidemic Model to Daily Cases of COVID-19 Reported During the 2021-2022 Omicron Surge in New York City: A Novel Approach 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.