Back

Diagnostic Role of Wall Thickness Heterogeneity in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy and in Carriers of Sarcomeric Gene Mutations

Aquaro, G. D.; Licordari, R.; Todiere, G.; Ianni, U.; De Gori, C.; Merlo, M.; Barison, A.; De Luca, A.; Grigoratos, C.; Raimondi, F.; Ait-Ali, L.; Festa, P.; Negri, F.; Falletta, C.; Bianco, F.; Ricci, F.; Botto, N.; Taddei, L.; Alberti, M.; Italiano, A.; Gargani, L.; Clemenza, F.; Faggioni, L.; Cioni, D.; Lencioni, R.; Emdin, M.; Neri, E.; Sinagra, G.; De Caterina, R.; Di Bella, G.

2025-08-02 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2025.07.31.25332464 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundHypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is characterized by variable left ventricular hypertrophy, but current diagnostic criteria rely on absolute wall thickness thresholds that may miss early or subtle phenotypic expressions, especially in sarcomere mutation carriers. ObjectivesThis study aimed to assess whether wall thickness standard deviation (WTSD), as a marker of wall thickness heterogeneity, improves the identification of HCM and mutation carriers. MethodsWe evaluated 382 healthy controls, 297 patients with guideline-based HCM diagnosis, and 82 sarcomere mutation carriers without overt hypertrophy using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. End-diastolic wall thickness (WT) was measured across 16 myocardial segments, and WTSD was calculated. Diagnostic performance of WTSD and other wall thickness-derived parameters was assessed using age- and sex-specific thresholds. ResultsWTSD was significantly higher in HCM patients (4.3 {+/-} 1.1 mm) and mutation carriers (2.3 {+/-} 0.3 mm) compared to healthy controls (1.3 {+/-} 0.3 mm; p<0.0001). WTSD identified 97% of HCM patients and 64% of mutation carriers, with excellent specificity (99%). In females, WTSD achieved a sensitivity of 98.9% and specificity of 100% for HCM diagnosis, and identified 74% of female mutation carriers. WTSD outperformed demographic-based personalized thresholds and BSA-indexed maximal WT in all subgroups. Mutation carriers exhibited increased heterogeneity due to the coexistence of hypertrophic and thinned segments, despite normal absolute WT. ConclusionsWTSD is a robust imaging biomarker that detects early and overt manifestations of sarcomeric HCM with high accuracy. Incorporating WT heterogeneity into diagnostic algorithms may enhance early identification, particularly in women and mutation carriers. CONDENSED ABSTRACTWall thickness heterogeneity, quantified as wall thickness standard deviation (WTSD) by magnetic resonance, emerged as a powerful diagnostic marker of sarcomeric hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). In 297 HCM patients and 82 mutation carriers, WTSD identified nearly all overt cases and 64% of carriers without hypertrophy with excellent specificity (99%). Particularly in women, WTSD achieved near-perfect diagnostic accuracy and uncovered early disease otherwise missed by conventional thresholds. These findings support incorporating WT heterogeneity into diagnostic algorithms to enable earlier identification of at-risk individuals and refine risk stratification beyond absolute wall thickness criteria.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.0%
2
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
3
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
9.9%
4
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
5
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 20%
6.2%
7
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.7%
8
European Heart Journal
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.7%
9
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.2%
10
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.0%
11
Heart
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
12
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
13
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
14
Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.6%
15
Nature Cardiovascular Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.2%
17
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 52%
0.9%
18
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
19
Circulation: Heart Failure
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
20
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%