Back

BrainSignsNET: A Deep Learning Model for 3D Anatomical Landmark Detection in the Human Brain Imaging

shirzadeh barough, s.; Ventura, C.; Bilgel, M.; Albert, M.; Miller, M. I.; Moghekar, A.

2025-08-05 radiology and imaging
10.1101/2025.07.31.25332457 medRxiv
Show abstract

Accurate detection of anatomical landmarks in brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scans is essential for reliable spatial normalization, image alignment, and quantitative neuroimaging analyses. In this study, we introduce BrainSignsNET, a deep learning framework designed for robust three-dimensional (3D) landmark detection. Our approach leverages a multi-task 3D convolutional neural network that integrates an attention decoder branch with a multi-class decoder branch to generate precise 3D heatmaps, from which landmark coordinates are extracted. The model was trained and internally validated on T1-weighted Magnetization-Prepared Rapid Gradient-Echo (MPRAGE) scans from the Alzheimers Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI), the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging (BLSA), and the Biomarkers of Cognitive Decline in Adults at Risk for AD (BIOCARD) datasets and externally validated on a clinical dataset from the Johns Hopkins Hydrocephalus Clinic. The study encompassed 14,472 scans from 6,299 participants, representing a diverse demographic profile with a significant proportion of older adult participants, particularly those over 70 years of age. Extensive preprocessing and data augmentation strategies, including traditional MRI corrections and tailored 3D transformations, ensured data consistency and improved model generalizability. Performance metrics demonstrated that on internal validation BrainSignsNET achieved an overall mean Euclidean distance of 2.32 {+/-} 0.41 mm and 94.8% of landmarks localized within their anatomically defined 3D volumes in the external validation dataset. This improvement in accurate anatomical landmark detection on brain MRI scans should benefit many imaging tasks, including registration, alignment, and quantitative analyses.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.