BrainSignsNET: A Deep Learning Model for 3D Anatomical Landmark Detection in the Human Brain Imaging
shirzadeh barough, s.; Ventura, C.; Bilgel, M.; Albert, M.; Miller, M. I.; Moghekar, A.
Show abstract
Accurate detection of anatomical landmarks in brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scans is essential for reliable spatial normalization, image alignment, and quantitative neuroimaging analyses. In this study, we introduce BrainSignsNET, a deep learning framework designed for robust three-dimensional (3D) landmark detection. Our approach leverages a multi-task 3D convolutional neural network that integrates an attention decoder branch with a multi-class decoder branch to generate precise 3D heatmaps, from which landmark coordinates are extracted. The model was trained and internally validated on T1-weighted Magnetization-Prepared Rapid Gradient-Echo (MPRAGE) scans from the Alzheimers Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI), the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging (BLSA), and the Biomarkers of Cognitive Decline in Adults at Risk for AD (BIOCARD) datasets and externally validated on a clinical dataset from the Johns Hopkins Hydrocephalus Clinic. The study encompassed 14,472 scans from 6,299 participants, representing a diverse demographic profile with a significant proportion of older adult participants, particularly those over 70 years of age. Extensive preprocessing and data augmentation strategies, including traditional MRI corrections and tailored 3D transformations, ensured data consistency and improved model generalizability. Performance metrics demonstrated that on internal validation BrainSignsNET achieved an overall mean Euclidean distance of 2.32 {+/-} 0.41 mm and 94.8% of landmarks localized within their anatomically defined 3D volumes in the external validation dataset. This improvement in accurate anatomical landmark detection on brain MRI scans should benefit many imaging tasks, including registration, alignment, and quantitative analyses.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- OpenMAP-T1: A Rapid Deep Learning Approach to Parcellate 280 Anatomical Regions to Cover the Whole Brain 97%
- Anatomy-guided, modality-agnostic segmentation of neuroimaging abnormalities 96%
- Ultra-low-field paediatric MRI in low- and middle-income countries: super-resolution using a multi-orientation U-Net 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Automated joint skull-stripping and segmentation with Multi-Task U-Net in large mouse brain MRI databases 96%
- Fusion of quantitative susceptibility maps and T1-weighted images improve braintissue contrast in primates 96%
- Tensor Image Registration Library: Automated Deformable Registration of Stand-Alone Histology Images to Whole-Brain Post-Mortem MRI Data 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Automated Generation of Cerebral Blood Flow Maps Using Deep Learning and Multiple Delay Arterial Spin-Labelled MRI 97%
- MASiVar: Multisite, Multiscanner, and Multisubject Acquisitions for Studying Variability in Diffusion Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging 96%
- PreQual: An automated pipeline for integrated preprocessing and quality assurance of diffusion weighted MRI images 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Spatial Patterns and Determinants of Cerebrospinal Fluid Circulation in the Human Brain 96%
- ReMiND: Recovery of Missing Neuroimaging using Diffusion Models with Application to Alzheimer’s Disease 95%
- BrainQCNet: a Deep Learning attention-based model for the automated detection of artifacts in brain structural MRI scans. 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Deep neural networks allow expert-level brain meningioma detection, segmentation and improvement of current clinical practice 95%
- A multimodal computational pipeline for 3D histology of the human brain 95%
- An AI-based segmentation and analysis pipeline for high-field MR monitoring of cerebral organoids 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.