Steric control of signaling bias in the immunometabolic receptor GPR84
Wang, P.; Zhang, X.; Guseinov, A.-A.; Jenkins, L.; von Hallerstein, C.; Colburn, J. D.; Ives, R.; Luscombe, V. B.; Marsango, S.; Oktavia, L.; Raja, A.; Greaves, D. R.; Biggin, P. C.; Milligan, G.; Zhang, C.; Tikhonova, I.; Russell, A. J.
Show abstract
Biased signaling in G protein-coupled receptors offers therapeutic promise, yet rational design of biased ligands remains challenging due to limited mechanistic understanding. Here, we report a molecular framework for controlling signaling bias at the immunometabolic receptor GPR84. We identified three structurally-matched ligands (OX04529, OX04954, and OX04539) with varying steric profiles that exhibit comparable Gi protein activation but dramatically different {beta}-arrestin recruitment capacities. A high- resolution cryo-EM structure of GPR84-Gi in complex with OX04529, complemented by molecular dynamics simulations and targeted mutagenesis, revealed that steric interactions between ligand substituents and Leu3366.52 and Phe1875.47 indirectly disrupt a critical polar network involving Tyr3326.48, Asn1043.36 and Asn3627.45 essential for {beta}-arrestin recruitment. Based on these insights, we developed a steric-dependent model that enabled rational design of G protein-biased agonists with predictable {beta}-arrestin recruitment profiles. This mechanistic framework provides a blueprint for designing biased agonists with customized signaling profiles at GPR84 and potentially other class A GPCRs.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Molecular insights into ago-allosteric modulation of the human glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor 97%
- Structure and mechanism of oxalate transporter OxlT in an oxalate-degrading bacterium in the gut microbiota 97%
- An autoinhibited state of 53BP1 revealed by small molecule antagonists and protein engineering 97%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.