DNA Circle-sequencing lowers the single molecule sequencing error threshold and identifies ultrasonication as a source of DNA damage
Baehr, S.; Gout, J.-F.; Reyes, L.; Ray, H.; Lynch, M.
Show abstract
DNA mutation is the ultimate source of all heritable genetic and phenotypic variation. On human timescales, DNA mutation results in the evolution of antibiotic resistance, viral resistance to vaccines, the emergence human cancers, and more. Precise measurement of DNA mutation is therefore desirable to rapidly detect and analyze low frequency mutations in a population of cells. Precise measurement of DNA mutation by high throughput sequencing has been hindered by sequencing error rates, which occur at rates 1x10-2 to 1x10-3 per base sequenced. Previous work on circle sequencing had pushed a putative sequencing error rate down to roughly 2.8x10-4 per base for genomic yeast DNA in the absence of DNA repair enzymes, where the expected number is 4.7x10-9 per base per generation. Through revision of the assay, we are now capable of taking 125ng of genomic DNA and obtaining mutation rate estimates with a sequencing resolution floor of 2x10-7 per base in the absence of repair enzymes, a resolution improvement of over 3 orders of magnitude. In practice, circle-seq recovers some of the mutation spectrum of mismatch-repair deficient E. coli, although some signature of C [->] T and G [->] A errors remain present. Curiously, it calls a mutation rate of 2x10-9 per base per generation, lower than expected, underscoring the difficulty of directly comparing mutation rates per base to MA mutation rates per site per generation. This protocol readily recognizes Covaris ultrasonication as mutagenic in library preps, with a mutation spectrum dominated by G:C [->] A:T, G:C [->] C:G, and G:C [->] T:A errors. The protocol is either detecting in vivo DNA damage that has yet to be repaired, is significantly biased in its ability to detect mutations, or is not yet sensitive enough to detect mutation rates of MMR-E. coli cells. The protocol may have some use in measuring mutation abundance from tissue samples, and in vitro sources of DNA damage. The protocol also highlights some biases inherent to single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) cyclization, including a 10-bp periodicity which echoes the constraints of dsDNA cyclization.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Saturated Transposon Analysis in Yeast as a One-step Method to Quantify the Fitness Effects of Gene Disruptions on a Genome-Wide Scale 94%
- Amplified DNA Heterogeneity Assessment with Oxford Nanopore Sequencing Applied to Cell Free Expression Templates 94%
- High-throughput Kinetics using Capillary Electrophoresis and Robotics (HiKER) platform used to Study T7, T3, and Sp6 RNA Polymerase Misincorporation 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Identifying the essential genes of Mycobacterium avium subsp. hominissuis with Tn-Seq using a rank-based filter procedure. 93%
- VarLOCK - sequencing independent, rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern for point-of-care testing, qPCR pipelines and national wastewater surveillance 93%
- Efficient DNA-based data storage using shortmer combinatorial encoding 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cost Effective, Experimentally Robust Differential Expression Analysis for Human/Mammalian, Pathogen, and Dual-Species Transcriptomics 94%
- Comparison of R9.4.1/Kit10 and R10/Kit12 Oxford Nanopore flowcells and chemistries in bacterial genome reconstruction 94%
- Identifying the best PCR enzyme for library amplification in NGS 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.