Back

Patterns and drivers of 43,617 mosaic chromosomal alterations in blood

Tang, D.; Kamitaki, N.; Mukamel, R. E.; Rubinacci, S.; Loh, P.-R.

2025-07-30 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2025.07.30.25332451 medRxiv
Show abstract

Clonal expansions of hematopoietic cells carrying mosaic chromosomal alterations (mCAs) are commonly detectable in elderly individuals. Here, we studied 43,617 autosomal mCAs that we ascertained in 484,081 UK Biobank participants using new, high-resolution computational methods to analyze blood-derived whole-genome sequencing data. Shorter mCAs ([&le;]1 Mb) clustered at 53 genomic hotspots (34 previously undetected), several of which implicated chromosomal fragile sites as a recurrent source of somatic deletions. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)-associated deletions at 13q14 were detectable in 1% of 65- to 70-year-old individuals--a five-fold higher rate than previously observed--suggesting opportunities for incorporating this mosaic mutation in clinical screening and in genetic association studies. Rare protein-coding variants in 38 genes associated (p<1.2x10-5; FDR<0.01) with clonal expansions of copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity (CN-LOH) mutations that modified the allelic dosages of these variants, implicating genes in DNA damage response, cell cycle, cytokine signaling, and protein ubiquitination pathways as targets of clonal selection via CN-LOH-induced allelic substitution. For several genes with proliferation-increasing functions, CN-LOH mutations produced revertant mosaicism, removing deleterious inherited variants. Polygenic effects of common inherited variants within CN-LOH mutations also contributed modestly to clonal selection. These results show that our blood genomes are constantly evolving as we age and often accrue mCAs in predictable ways.

Published in Nature Genetics (predicted rank #1) · training set

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.