Back

Medical Clinical Minds Meet Artificial Intelligence: Italian Physicians' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Concordance between Italian Physicians and AI-Generated Diagnoses. A National Cross-Sectional Study

Cofini, V.; Muselli, M.; Piccardi, L.; Benvenuti, E.; Di Pangrazio, G.; Mancinelli, M.; Cimino, E.; Palermo, P.; Petrucci, E.; Picchi, G.; Tobia, L.; Barbonetti, A.; Desideri, G.; Fabiani, L.; Guido, M.; Marinangeli, F.; Necozione, S.

2025-07-30 medical education
10.1101/2025.07.30.25332423 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundArtificial Intelligence has increasingly been integrated into clinical practice, yet its adoption and perception among medical professionals remain poorly understood, particularly in the Italian healthcare system. To investigate Italian physicians knowledge, attitudes, and clinical concordance with AI-generated diagnostic recommendations, using a validated questionnaire and a clinical scenario processed by ChatGPT. MethodsA national, cross-sectional web-based survey was conducted among 587 Italian physicians using an online validated questionnaire. The first part of the questionnaire assessed self-reported knowledge, prior experience, attitudes, and willingness to adopt AI in medicine. The second part assessed clinical concordance between AI proposals and physicians about clinical cases evaluated by ChatGPT. Results Most participants reported basic AI knowledge (n=380, 64.8%) and minimal exposure to AI training (18.4%). Only 21.6% reported they used AI in clinical practice, and the most familiar application was diagnostic imaging (35.4% of AI users; 7.7% of the total sample). Major perceived barriers included lack of training (76.7%) and resistance to change (50.9%). In the universal clinical scenario, physicians showed the highest agreement with ChatGPTs correct diagnosis (mean=4.07) compared to incorrect alternatives (mean=2.57 and 1.82, p<0.001). For correct diagnosis, the agreement rate was very high at 89% [86%-91%]. ConclusionsItalian physicians showed a strong interest in adopting AI tools, despite significant knowledge gaps and limited practical experience. The high concordance between physicians evaluations and ChatGPTs diagnostic insights suggests potential for AI-based decision support in clinical workflows. Targeted training and institutional support are essential to bridge the gap between enthusiasm and readiness for AI integration.

Published in Frontiers in Digital Health (predicted rank #3) · training set

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.