Back

The synergistic impact of serology and nucleic acid test to enhance blood transfusion safety: a retrospective observational study among blood donors at tertiary care hospital in Pakistan

Ata, U.; Sohail, A.; Waheed, S.; Ali, S.; Bukhari, U.

2025-07-30 hematology
10.1101/2025.07.30.25332420 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the impact of combined use of chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) and nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT) to improve transfusion transmitted Hepatitis B Virus (HBV), Hepatitis C virus (HCV) and Human Immunodeficiency Virus-1 (HIV-1) among blood donors in Pakistan. DesignRetrospective, single center observational. SettingRegional blood center at tertiary care hospital in urban Pakistan. ParticipantsAll adults of 18 years or above who were eligible to donate blood after meeting the pre-donation screening criteria during the study period (n = 26,778). Outcome MeasuresPrimary outcome measure was to estimate the incremental yield of HBV, HCV, and HIV-1 infections using combined CLIA+NAAT compared to CLIA-alone per 100,000 donations. Secondary outcome was to calculate inter-test agreement and discordance between CLIA and NAAT methods. ResultsAmong 26,778 donors, the combined CLIA+NAAT testing detected a total of 2,423.6 viral infections per 100,000 donations, NAAT alone contributed 739.7/100,000 of these. For HBV, NAAT uniquely detected 489/100,000 additional cases missed by CLIA; the combined detection rate was 1,561/100,000. For HCV, NAAT-only yield was lower (247/100,000), with total detection of 825.3/100,000. HIV-1 was rare in the donor pool; incremental NAAT yield was 3.7/100,000, with a combined detection rate of 37.3/100,000. Agreement between tests was substantial for HBV ({kappa} = 0.63) and moderate to fair for HCV ({kappa} = 0.47) and HIV-1 ({kappa} = 0.40). The discordant cases detected by NAAT alone for HBV, HCV and HIV-1 were 183, 431 and 37 respectively. McNemars test showed statistically significant differences (p < 0.001) across all markers, with large effect sizes for HIV-1 (0.92, 95% CI: 0.80-1.00) and HCV (0.69, 95% CI: 0.65-0.73). ConclusionIntegrating CLIA with NAAT enhanced the detection of HBV, including occult and window period infections, and refined estimates of active HCV and HIV-1 infections which significantly improved blood transfusion safety. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS OF THIS STUDYO_LIThe selection bias was reduced by including all consecutive eligible blood donors during study period. C_LIO_LIThe information bias was minimized through uniform, fully automated, and validated protocols for combined CLIA and NAAT testing of blood donors. C_LIO_LIThe single center retrospective study design restricts generalizability and causal inference. C_LIO_LIThe false positives/negatives and genetic variability were not confirmed. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 13%
14.3%
2
Transfusion
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
3
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 2%
8.4%
4
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.3%
5
Public Health in Practice
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
6
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
7
British Journal of Haematology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
9
Transplantation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
10
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.1%
11
Blood
67 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.9%
12
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
13
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
14
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
15
Cytometry Part A
30 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
16
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
17
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
18
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
19
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
20
Tropical Medicine & International Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
21
Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
22
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
23
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
24
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.9%
25
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
26
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
27
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
28
The American Journal of Pathology
31 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
29
Blood Advances
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
30
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%