Livestock Landscapes as Ecological Filters: Effects of the Tree Cover Gradient on the Taxonomic and Functional Diversity of Granivorous Birds in the Colombian Amazon
Diaz-Chaux, J. T.; Velasquez-Valencia, A.; Navarro-Morales, A.; Casanoves, F.
Show abstract
Livestock landscapes in the Colombian Amazon are undergoing rapid land-use changes, leading to the structural simplification of vegetation and the loss of avifauna and its ecological functions. This study evaluated the effect of tree cover as an ecological filter on the taxonomic and functional diversity of granivorous birds within livestock mosaics. Eight livestock landscape mosaics were analyzed and classified based on tree cover into open, semi-open, and semi-closed categories. Bird surveys were conducted using point counts and mist netting, and eight morphological traits were measured across the 22 recorded species. Five functional diversity indices were calculated to assess the response to the tree cover gradient through their morphological traits. A reduction in tree cover excludes functionally specialized species and favors generalist communities with redundant traits. Semi-closed and semi-open covers harbored higher functional and taxonomic diversity, showing high levels of richness and functional evenness, with niche complementarity. Open pastures exhibited lower trait variability and clustering with reduced ecological functionality. Larger granivorous species were associated with denser vegetation, whereas smaller species were linked to more open, highly disturbed areas. Greater tree cover promotes the coexistence of granivorous bird species by increasing the availability of microhabitats and resource diversity, which are exploited by species with different functional traits. This highlights the importance of conserving structurally complex vegetation within livestock matrices, using silvopastoral systems to enhance the resilience and functionality of productive Amazonian landscapes.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Long-term Christmas Bird Counts describe Neotropical urban bird diversity 96%
- Potential mammalian species for investigating the past connections between Amazonia and the Atlantic Forest 95%
- Do you have enough space? Habitat selection of insectivorous cave-dwelling bats in fragmented landscapes of Eastern Amazon 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Big trees drive forest structure patterns across a lowland Amazon regrowth gradient 93%
- Factors influencing riverine utilization patterns in two sympatric macaques 93%
- Does rainforest biodiversity stand on the shoulders of giants? Effect of disturbances by forest elephants on trees and insects on Mount Cameroon 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Gut microbial community in proboscis monkeys (Nasalis larvatus): implications for effects of geographical and social factors 92%
- Mapping threatened Thai bovids provides opportunities for improved conservation outcomes in Asia 91%
- Hurricane-induced demographic changes in a nonhuman primate population 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Field margins as substitute habitat for the conservation of birds in agricultural wetlands 93%
- Conservation networks do not match the ecological requirements of amphibians 92%
- Are all waterholes equal from a lion's view? Exploring the role of prey abundance and catchability in waterhole visitation patterns in a savannah ecosystem 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Between a rock and a hard place: Effects of land-use change on rock-dwelling animals of lateritic plateaus in the northern Western Ghats 93%
- Biotic Assessment of Crowdsourced Data Defines Four Ecoregions in Thar: A Novel Approach for Citizen Engagement in Conservation 92%
- Integrating spatial, phylogenetic, and threat assessment data from frogs and lizards to identify areas for conservation priorities in Peninsular Malaysia 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.