Back

Cell-specific responses of Anopheles gambiae fat body to blood feeding and infection at a single nuclei resolution

de Carvalho, S. S.; McNinch, C.; Barletta, A. B. F.; Barillas-Mury, C.

2025-07-29 molecular biology
10.1101/2025.07.29.667437 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The mosquito fat body plays key roles in metabolism and immunity, yet its cellular diversity and functional specialization remain unclear. We characterized the Anopheles gambiae fat body and associated cells, examining their responses to blood feeding, bacterial infection, and immune priming following Plasmodium berghei infection, at single-cell resolution. We analyzed 97,650 nuclei from the female mosquitos abdominal body wall and identified seven major cell types. Fat body trophocytes were the most abundant ([~]85% of cells), while sessile hemocytes represented 7.4% of cells. Trophocytes consisted of five subpopulations, including basal (T1, T2), metabolic-enriched (T3), immune-responsive (T4), and a vitellogenic population (T5) exclusive to blood-fed females. T4 trophocytes exhibited constitutive expression of immune genes, while multiple cell types, including other trophocytes, hemocytes, and epidermal epithelial cells, responded to a systemic bacterial challenge. Oenocytes (1.1% of cells) induced the expression of enzymes involved in the biosynthesis of lipids in response to immune priming. Blood feeding triggered massive transcriptomic changes, with a strong induction of vitellogenin and multiple genes involved in DNA replication, consistent with trophocyte endoreplication and metabolic reprogramming. Interestingly, vitellogenin mRNA was expressed only in the first layer of trophocytes facing the hemolymph and had an apical subcellular localization. These findings provide a high-resolution atlas of fat body and associated cells, revealing specialized roles in immunity and reproduction and offering insights into how mosquitoes coordinate metabolic and immune functions at the cellular level.

Published in Nature Communications (predicted rank #2) · training set

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.