Back

Fibroblast depletion reveals mammalian epithelial resilience across neonatal and adult stages

Gaeta, I. M.; Du, S.; Villeneuve, C.; Gonzalez, D. G.; Matte-Martone, C.; Ganesan, S.; Simpson, D.; Moore, J. L.; Kam, C. Y.; Gallini, S.; Wei, H.; Bertillot, F.; Zeuschner, D.; Gonzalez, L. E.; Sumigray, K.; Wickstrom, S. A.; Greco, V.

2025-07-31 cell biology
10.1101/2025.07.29.667423 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Regenerative organs, like the skin, depend on niche-stem cell interactions that sustain continuous cellular turnover. In cell culture, skin fibroblasts promote epidermal stem cell proliferation and differentiation. Yet, it remains elusive how fibroblasts regulate epidermal stem cell behaviors and differentiation in vivo. Here, we asked how fibroblast depletion may impact epidermal stem cell proliferation in the context of adult homeostasis. Surprisingly, we find that significant depletion of fibroblast density does not affect epidermal stem cell proliferative capacity during adult stages in vivo. We next probed earlier neonatal stages when skin is actively remodeling but found no change in epidermal stem cell proliferative capacity following fibroblast depletion. These results demonstrate that across different ages, epidermal stem cell proliferative capacity can persist in the face of a largely reduced fibroblast population. Interestingly, neonatal fibroblast depletion does not significantly reduce their secreted collagen I density but affects basement membrane mechanics and epidermal stem cell delamination. Despite these changes to basement membrane mechanics and delamination, the skin continues to maintain its protective barrier function. Thus, our work demonstrates the skin regenerative program employs robust compensatory mechanisms in the face of fibroblast depletion to maintain functional capacity.

Published in Journal of Cell Biology (predicted rank #21) · training set

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.