Back

Development and Characterization of Triazole-Based WDR5 Inhibitors for the Treatment of Glioblastoma

Coker, J. A.; Martinez, S. R.; Han, S. H.; Sloan, A. R.; Gupta, A. K.; Bukenya, G.; Polzer, P.; Ramos, J. H.; Rico, E.; Rico, A.; Lindsey, A. A.; Navadgi, T.; Reitz, N.; Romigh, T.; Goins, C. M.; Hubert, C. G.; Wang, N. S.; Cheng, F. R.; Alvarado, J.; Sprowls, S. A.; Lathia, J. D.; Stauffer, S. R.

2025-07-31 cancer biology
10.1101/2025.07.29.667410 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM) cancer stem cells (CSCs) contribute to tumor recurrence, treatment resistance, and dismal clinical outcomes. Genetic and pharmacological evidence suggests that the nuclear scaffolding protein WD-repeat containing protein 5 (WDR5) is a therapeutic vulnerability of the CSC population. However, previously reported WDR5 inhibitors display low permeability and are unable to penetrate the blood-brain barrier (BBB), limiting their utility in GBM. Herein, we report the structure-guided development of a novel series of triazole-based WDR5 WIN-site inhibitors designed to increase passive brain penetration. We identified triazole-based WDR5 inhibitors that are potent, passively permeable, and in some cases more brain penetrant than other scaffolds. We phenotypically assessed our novel WDR5 inhibitors in a panel of patient-derived CSC models and uncovered unique WDR5-regulated metabolic genes in GBM. We also evaluated their antiproliferative activity against CSCs both in vitro and in vivo. Finally, to identify novel combination opportunities, we screened a 2,100-compound chemical probe library and identified that the ATAD2 inhibitor BAY-850 synergizes with WDR5 inhibitors to enhance CSC killing. Our work diversifies the chemical matter targeting WDR5, clarifies the in vitro consequences of WIN-site inhibition in CSCs, and encourages the future development of next-generation WDR5 inhibitors with the potential to achieve in vivo efficacy in the brain.

Published in JCI Insight · training set

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.