Back

Pulsed-electron illumination does not reduce beam damage for imaging biological macromolecules

Kumar, V.; Radecke, J.; K.V., C.; Mohammed, I.; Guerrero-Ferreira, R. C.; Harder, D.; Fotiadis, D.; Stahlberg, H.

2025-08-01 molecular biology
10.1101/2025.07.29.667395 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Radiation damage remains a fundamental limitation in cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM), constraining the total electron dose that can be used and thus limiting high-resolution imaging of biological specimens. Recent studies have proposed that temporally structured or pulsed electron beams could reduce radiation damage by allowing time for energy dissipation between individual electron interactions. To evaluate this hypothesis, we conducted a systematic investigation using a radiofrequency (RF) driven 300 kV Titan Krios microscope equipped with cold field emission gun (c-FEG) to generate highly regular pulsed electron beams for specimens under cryogenic conditions. We compared radiation damage in three representative samples: paraffin 2D crystals, bacteriorhodopsin (purple membrane) 2D crystals, and plunge-frozen tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) in vitreous ice, under both pulsed and conventional (= random) illumination, while keeping all other imaging conditions constant. Radiation damage was quantified by tracking the decay of computed diffraction intensities to determine the critical dose (Ne). We observed no statistically significant difference in critical dose between pulsed and random illumination across all 3 samples. Our findings provide a critical reference point for future development and evaluation of temporally modulated electron sources in cryo-EM instrumentation.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Structural Biology
58 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
42.1%
2
IUCrJ
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.3%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 14%
6.8%
50% of probability mass above
4
Optics Express
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.5%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.3%
6
Journal of Structural Biology: X
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
7
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 34%
2.2%
8
Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology
54 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
9
Neurophotonics
37 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
10
Nanoscale Advances
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.6%
11
Journal of Applied Crystallography
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.6%
12
Journal of Microscopy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
13
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.0%
14
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.0%
15
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
16
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
17
BMC Methods
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
18
Optica
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
19
Radiotherapy and Oncology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
20
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
21
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
22
ACS Photonics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
23
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%
24
Small Methods
26 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%