Back

Aridity shapes adaptive genomic divergence and population connectivity in a Southern African rodent

Keilani, H. S.; Fiston-Lavier, A.-S.; Caminade, P.; Loiseau, A.; Galan, M.; Parrinello, H.; Brouat, C.; Leblois, R.; Avenant, N.; Pillay, N.; Ganem, G.; Smadja, C. M.

2025-07-29 genomics
10.1101/2025.07.29.667317 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Elucidating the drivers of evolution in dry environments is central to understanding how organisms respond to climate change. While research on the genomics of adaptation is growing, aridity-driven intraspecific divergence remains poorly quantified. Here, we address this gap by using genomic data from 230 individuals of the arid-adapted four-striped mouse Rhabdomys bechuanae, sampled across an aridity gradient in southern Africa, a region facing increasing aridification. Combining these data with palaeoclimatic reconstructions and present-day aridity indices, we investigate, from a spatio-temporal perspective, how intraspecific genetic variation relates to aridity. Inference of past effective population size revealed a sharp decline in the late Pleistocene, coinciding with regional aridification and potentially reflecting changes in connectivity during dry periods. Current population structure followed a pattern of isolation by distance and mirrored the aridity gradient. Genotype-Environment Association analyses identified SNPs and genes significantly associated with aridity and genetically differentiated among populations, with functions related to water and energy conservation - as expected under arid conditions - as well as neurotransmission. These findings highlight the underappreciated role for neurological processes in coping with water and resource scarcity. More broadly, our integrative genomics approach suggests that aridity shapes population connectivity and adaptation, with implications for climate resilience.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.