Back

Eye care risk and safety issues identified by Optometrists in Scotland: a focus group study

Armstrong, D.; Graham, J.; Rousselet, L.; Bowie, P.

2025-07-30 ophthalmology
10.1101/2025.07.29.25332365 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionEvidence on the nature and scale of risk and safety concerns in Optometry practice is very limited, especially compared with other primary care professions. In Scotland, many changes occurred in the profession during and because of the Covid-19 pandemic. The theme of risk and patient safety was, therefore, chosen as the priority focus for the 2022 mandatory national training programme, which Optometrists providing General Ophthalmic Services in Scotland are required to undertake. AimTo explore and identify perceived current and future safety risks and how these might be mitigated in relation to professional Optometry practice in Scotland. MethodsStudy participants were all registered General Optical Council (GOC) members from nine of the 14 regional health boards in Scotland. Data was collected via three online focus groups over a 2-month period during 2021 with each comprising six to eight participants. Data were transcribed with permission and then subjected to a basic thematic analysis. Results16 Optometrists participated in the study. Six principal themes were generated from the data analysis: 1. Current Overview and Context (e.g. perceived increased risk); 2. Competency Risks (e.g. skills and knowledge to manage disease); 3. Conduct Risks (e.g. behaviours of practitioners); 4. Contextual Risks (e.g environmental issues); 5. Future Risks (e.g. technology); and 6. Risk Mitigations (e.g education and training.) ConclusionThe Optometry profession is concerned the level of clinical risk is increasing, mainly related to technology, scope of practice, role development and changes in patient demand. Multiple recommendations are made to minimise risks including education for new roles; increased focus on improving care quality; support to those involved in safety incidents and complaints; taking a systems approach to areas of high risk; and sharing good practices. What is already known on this topicsummarise the state of scientific knowledge on this subject before you did your study and why this study needed to be done O_LIResearch into patient safety and exploring clinical and organisational risks in the primary care professions is underdeveloped compared with secondary care settings. C_LIO_LIIn professional optometry practice empirical evidence of safety concerns and risks is even more limited. C_LIO_LILatterly, there has been some focus on these issues from a professional regulatory, policy, research and education perspective, but this is still rudimentary compared to other primary and community-based professions. C_LI What this study addssummarise what we now know as a result of this study that we did not know before O_LIThe findings generated provide some evidence of the reported safety and risk concerns perceived by experienced optometry professionals, particularly related to competency, professional conduct, organisational issues, and future risks. Suggestions for risk mitigations were also captured. C_LI How this study might affect research, practice or policysummarise the implications of this study O_LIThe findings provide some insights for policy makers, educators and practitioners on reported safety and risk priorities in the optometry profession. C_LIO_LIStudy outcomes have informed the development and implementation of targeted patient safety and risk management education for the optometry profession in Scotland which should be of interest to others in the UK and beyond. C_LIO_LIThe findings could also lay the groundwork for a future programme of patient safety improvement and risk reduction interventions similar to those introduced in other primary care settings. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.