Back

Differential disease tolerance mediates sex-biased illness severity in sepsis

Dobson, B.; Strayer, K.; wijesinghe, A.; Schlechte, J.; Changirwa, D.; Cho, N. A.; Yu, I.-l.; McDonald, B.

2025-07-31 pathology
10.1101/2025.07.28.667282 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Sepsis in humans, as well as mouse models of infection, demonstrates sex-biased outcomes in which males tend to have a higher incidence, higher severity, and higher mortality compared to females. Despite this important sex-bias in sepsis outcomes, little is known about its mechanistic drivers nor therapeutic implications, as much of the foundational data on sepsis pathogenesis is derived from animal studies that included only male subjects, potentially contributing to the notable paucity of successful mouse-to-human translation of sepsis therapeutics. In this study, we demonstrate that male-biased illness severity and organ dysfunction in mouse models of bacterial sepsis is mediated by impaired disease tolerance in males, involving impaired tolerogenic shifts in mitochondrial oxidative metabolism compared to females. Microbiological analyses and systems immunology characterization of sepsis between males and females revealed that sex-biased disease tolerance was independent of infection resistance mechanisms, as well as canonical immune/inflammatory dysregulation. Therapeutic potentiation of mitochondrial tolerance with doxycycline neutralized sexual dimorphism of illness severity and organ dysfunction through a male-predominant treatment effect. These data reveal that biological sex is a fundamental determinant of illness severity and treatment-responsiveness in sepsis through modulation of disease tolerance, which may be harnessed therapeutically to address sex-biased outcomes in sepsis. One sentence summarySex-biased illness severity in bacterial sepsis is caused by impaired disease tolerance in males that can be rescued by therapeutic potentiation of mitochondrial tolerance

Published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (predicted rank #7) · training set

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.