Back

Urbanisation drives biodiversity loss, fitness decline and community shifts in cavity-nesting Hymenoptera

Celikgil, A.; Henzschel, L.; Sänger, J.; Krause, P.; Nemetschek, A.; Husemann, M.; Theodorou, P.

2025-07-31 ecology
10.1101/2025.07.28.667168 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Urbanisation is reshaping landscapes worldwide, posing challenges to biodiversity and ecosystem function. Cavity-nesting Hymenoptera, including bees and wasps, deliver vital ecological services but are increasingly vulnerable to urbanisation. In this citizen science-based study, we deployed 286 trap nests across Leipzig and Hamburg (Germany) to investigate how urbanisation and landscape-scale environmental features influence the diversity, community composition, reproductive success, offspring survival and demographic status of these insects. Using Bayesian hierarchical and phylogenetically informed modelling, we found that urbanisation significantly reduced species richness, reproductive output and offspring survival in both guilds, despite stable nesting activity, suggesting potential ecological trap effects. For bees, urbanisation also reduced the probability of nests functioning as demographic sources. Environmental drivers shaped responses in taxon-specific ways: bee richness and survival increased with landscape diversity but declined with fragmentation, while wasp richness and nesting declined with higher temperatures, though survival increased with more green cover. Bee nests were more likely to serve as demographic sources in higher temperatures. Community composition responses also diverged; bee communities shifted via increased species turnover, while wasp assemblages remained relatively stable. Temperature was a major driver of compositional dissimilarity in both groups, whereas landscape diversity was associated with homogenisation in bees and diversification in wasps. Our findings demonstrate that cities filter cavity-nesting Hymenoptera through multiple ecological pathways, highlighting the need for differentiated conservation strategies that consider both habitat structure and taxon-specific responses.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Insect Conservation and Diversity
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.2%
2
Oikos
84 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.7%
3
Journal of Animal Ecology
75 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.1%
4
Journal of Applied Ecology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.8%
5
Molecular Ecology
336 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.8%
6
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.2%
7
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
8
Biotropica
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.4%
50% of probability mass above
9
Functional Ecology
61 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.2%
10
Ecological Applications
34 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
11
Landscape Ecology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.3%
12
Global Change Biology
78 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.3%
13
Global Ecology and Biogeography
47 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.3%
14
Oecologia
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.3%
15
Ecography
54 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.3%
16
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
17
Ecology Letters
135 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.1%
18
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
19
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.7%
20
Biological Conservation
46 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
21
Behavioral Ecology
36 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
22
Ecology
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
23
Journal of Ecology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
24
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.0%
25
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 71%
1.0%
26
Ecological Entomology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
27
Journal of Biogeography
46 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
28
Conservation Science and Practice
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
29
Ecological Monographs
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%