Back

About the alignment and 3D reconstruction of sparse cryo-scanning transmission electron tomography datasets

Trepout, S.

2025-07-31 biophysics
10.1101/2025.07.28.667105 bioRxiv
Show abstract

In electron microscopy, sparse imaging consists in the collection of a limited subset of the image pixels, which can be used to reduce electron beam damage. Scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) is particularly adapted to sparse imaging owing to the scanning nature of the method, scan patterns can be designed where fewer sample locations are targeted. However, since some of the pixels are not scanned, there is an inherent loss of information. Several algorithms were developed to reconstruct missing pixels with high fidelity. Whereas sparse imaging and missing pixel reconstruction in 2D experiments are mature methods, the application of sparse imaging in 3D scanning transmission electron tomography (STET) is rare and still under development. The main difficulty encountered in tomography studies is the tilt-series alignment, which must be accurate to ensure high-quality 3D reconstruction. Because sparse images contain only a certain portion of the original information, the images constituting sparse tilt-series might not share enough mutual information to guarantee an accurate alignment, even after missing pixel reconstruction. This work presents for the first time a thorough analysis of the fiducial alignment and reconstruction of sparse (cryo)STET tilt-series. Furthermore, the limits of sparse imaging are explored to estimate the minimum amount of information required to obtain good-quality 3D reconstructions. The use of a cryo-fixed biological sample is motivated by the fact that cryo-samples are typical highly beam-sensitive samples, and that the intricate nature and structure complexity of biological samples place them among the most difficult to reconstruct with high details.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Structural Biology
58 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
42.2%
2
Microscopy and Microanalysis
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.2%
3
Journal of Structural Biology: X
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.6%
50% of probability mass above
4
IUCrJ
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
5
Journal of Microscopy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.8%
7
Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology
54 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.9%
9
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.2%
10
Journal of Applied Crystallography
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
11
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.3%
12
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.9%
13
Optics Express
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
14
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
15
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.8%
16
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
17
Biophysical Reports
36 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
18
Frontiers in Physics
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
19
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
158 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
20
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%
21
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.5%
22
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.5%