Optimizing Atlas Counts for MRI-Guided Atlas-Based Autosegmentation of Swallowing Muscles in Head and Neck Radiotherapy
Belal, Z.; Wahid, K. A.; Stieb, S.; Drummey, R.; Sharafi, C. S.; Lai, S. Y.; Fuller, C. D.; McDonald, B. A.
Show abstract
PurposeRadiotherapy-induced dysphagia can significantly impair head and neck (H&N) cancer patients quality of life. Despite the dose-dependent relationship between radiotherapy and dysphagia, swallowing structures are not routinely contoured due to time and labor demands. We evaluated atlas-based autosegmentation (ABAS) on MRI, identifying the optimal number of atlases required to efficiently and accurately delineate swallowing structures. MethodsThis study included pre-radiotherapy simulation T2-weighted MRIs from 60 H&N cancer patients enrolled in an IRB-approved observational trial. Scans were acquired on a 1.5T Siemens Aera scanner with H&N immobilization. Swallowing structures, including epiglottis, constrictors, digastric muscles, genioglossus, and others, were manually contoured for 25 atlas patients and 35 test patients. GTV-involved structures were excluded. ABAS was performed with increasing numbers of atlases (1-25) using a random-forest algorithm (ABAS-ADMIRE; Elekta) to determine the optimal atlas count. To mitigate variability from atlas selection, bootstrap resampling was implemented. Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), surface DSC (SDSC), average surface distance (ASD), and 95% Hausdorff distance (HD95) were calculated for each structure. Median computation times were calculated for each atlas count. Hsus MCB analysis identified the minimum atlas number statistically equivalent to the best-performing atlas range. ResultsAcross all structures and metrics, Hsus analysis demonstrated that 2-4 atlases performed similarly to the best-performing atlas count. All structures except constrictors achieved median DSC>0.75 with [≥]2 atlases. Computation times increased linearly with atlas count (range: [~]22-950 seconds for 1-25 atlases). These findings highlight that smaller atlas counts achieve comparable accuracy while significantly improving time efficiency. ConclusionAtlas-based autosegmentation is useful for delineating swallowing muscles in radiotherapy, especially with limited available contoured datasets. Utilizing 2-4 atlases achieves similar geometric accuracy to larger atlas counts, significantly reducing computational time without compromising clinical quality. This balance between efficiency and accuracy supports integration into workflows for better dysphagia prediction and treatment planning.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Development of a High-Performance Multiparametric MRI Oropharyngeal Primary Tumor Auto-Segmentation Deep Learning Model and Investigation of Input Channel Effects: Results from a Prospective Imaging Registry 96%
- Auto-Detection and Segmentation of Involved Lymph Nodes in HPV-Associated Oropharyngeal Cancer Using a Convolutional Deep Learning Neural Network 95%
- Morphological changes after cranial fractionated photon radiotherapy: localized loss of white matter and grey matter volume with increasing dose 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comprehensive Quantitative Evaluation of Inter-observer Delineation Performance of MR-guided Delineation of Oropharyngeal Gross Tumor Volumes and High-risk Clinical Target Therapy: An R-IDEAL Stage 0 Prospective Study 96%
- Multi-institutional Normal Tissue Complication Probability (NTCP) Prediction Model for Mandibular Osteoradionecrosis: Results from the PREDMORN Study 92%
- Cluster-Based Toxicity Estimation of Osteoradionecrosis via Unsupervised Machine Learning: Moving Beyond Single Dose-Parameter Normal Tissue Complication Probability by Using Whole Dose-Volume Histograms for Cohort Risk Stratification 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Enhancing Semantic Segmentation in Chest X-Ray Images through Image Preprocessing: ps-KDE for Pixel-wise Substitution by Kernel Density Estimation 93%
- Internal calibration for opportunistic computed tomography muscle density analysis 92%
- Classification performance bias between training and test sets in a limited mammography dataset 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Quality Assurance Assessment of Intra-Acquisition Diffusion-Weighted and T2-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging Registration and Contour Propagation for Head and Neck Cancer Radiotherapy 95%
- PSMA-Hornet: fully-automated, multi-target segmentation of healthy organs in PSMA PET/CT images 93%
- Necessity and Impact of Specialization of Large Foundation Model for Medical Segmentation Tasks 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving Rectal Tumor Segmentation with Anomaly Fusion Derived from Anatomical Inpainting: A Multicenter Study 92%
- Deep neural networks allow expert-level brain meningioma detection, segmentation and improvement of current clinical practice 92%
- Inconsistency of AI in Intracranial Aneurysm Detection with Varying Dose and Image Reconstruction 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.