Back

Mechanisms of ATM Inhibitor AZD1390-Mediated Radiosensitization by Comparing DNA DSB Formation and Repair in 4T1 Cells

Atkinson, J.; Chopin, J.; Bezak, E.; Le, H.; Kempson, I.

2025-07-31 cancer biology
10.1101/2025.07.27.667090 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Radioresistant cancers often exhibit upregulated DNA damage response (DDR) proteins including ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM), recovering more readily from radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). ATM inhibitors (ATMi) are therefore being explored as adjuvants in radiotherapy to both enhance radiosensitivity and minimise normal tissue complications. The molecule AZD1390 has been developed as an inhibitor of ATM and is undergoing assessment in clinical trials. However, traditional markers of DNA DSB repair, such as {gamma}H2AX, represent stages of DDR downstream from the action of ATM. The ATMi AZD1390, developed by AstraZeneca, ultimately prevents phosphorylation of the H2AX histone variant. In order to quantify ATMi AZD1390 action, the novel and highly complementary assay SensiTive Recognition of Individual DNA Ends (STRIDE) was employed to directly quantify DSBs in comparison to {gamma}H2AX after X-ray irradiation of 4T1 cells. Findings revealed that ATM inhibition via AZD1390 delays DSB repair initiation and appears to play a greater role in suppressing DDR beyond ATM inhibition alone. In X-ray irradiated conditions, obfuscation of DSBs commenced between 30- to 45-minutes post-irradiation without AZD1390 versus 45 to 60-minutes for cells pretreated with AZD1390 and entirely prevented {gamma}H2AX in the majority of cells. STRIDE and {gamma}H2AX exhibited almost no co-localization indicating that they provide distinct and complementary information. DSB formation was also assessed in cells fixed pre-insult to minimise any biological response, providing unprecedented assessment of DSB formation. These results highlight the potential of STRIDE to accurately measure DNA damage response kinetics, paving the way for more precise mechanistic studies into the role of ATM in radiotherapy.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
18.8%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 19%
9.8%
3
DNA Repair
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.8%
4
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
8.0%
5
Oncotarget
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.6%
50% of probability mass above
6
Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
7
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.3%
8
Radiotherapy and Oncology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
9
Cancer Research Communications
51 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.4%
10
Cells
249 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
11
Biology Open
156 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
12
Frontiers in Oncology
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
13
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.1%
14
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
15
Experimental Dermatology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
16
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
40 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
17
Molecular Cancer Research
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
18
Free Radical Biology and Medicine
36 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
19
Cell Death Discovery
58 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
20
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.9%
21
Clinical Epigenetics
60 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
22
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.6%
23
Molecular Oncology
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
24
BMC Cancer
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
25
Photochemistry and Photobiology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
26
Epigenetics
50 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%