Back

AI-driven analysis for real-time detection of unstained microscopic cell culture images

Hildebrand, K.; Mögele, T.; Raith, D.; Kling, M.; Rubeck, A.; Schiele, S.; Meerdink, E.; Sapre, A.; Bermeitinger, J.; Trepel, M.; Claus, R.

2025-07-31 cell biology
10.1101/2025.07.27.667077 bioRxiv
Show abstract

AI-based image recognition has significantly advanced the analysis of tissues and individual cells both in the context of translational studies and diagnostics. To date, recognition is primarily based on the identification of certain cell characteristics (e.g. by staining). The morphological assessment of unstained cells holds additional potential, as it allows for virtually real-time assessment without the need to manipulate the cells. This facilitates longitudinal observations, as required for drug testing, and forms a basis for autonomous experimental execution. A semi-automated cell culture system (AICE3, LabMaite) was used to culture myeloid leukemic cell lines (K562, HL-60, Kasumi-1). K562 cells were treated with hemin and PMA to induce erythroid and megakaryocytic differentiation, respectively. Cell images were acquired using automated bright field microscopy. Images were used to train an AI model using an NVIDIA DGX A100 GPU with Ultralytics YOLOv8. Morphologic features were extracted using RedTell. The model reliably distinguished K562 cells from HL-60 and Kasumi-1 using >400 images per class (average >15 cells/image). Bounding boxes were generated correctly (mAP@.5 >98%); precision and sensitivity exceeded 97%. Validation on an external K562 dataset confirmed these results. Classification of all three cell lines achieved >97% sensitivity/specificity and 94.6% precision. To test drug response, we used YOLOv8-s to distinguish untreated K562 cells from those undergoing erythroid or megakaryocytic differentiation (n >3,000 annotations). Precision, sensitivity, and specificity were >95%. RedTell identified 3 of 74 morphological traits contributing significantly to class separation. We demonstrate accurate, near real-time detection of unstained cells, enabling future AI-based drug testing.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cytometry Part A
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
40.1%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 27%
6.5%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 17%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
4
Journal of Microscopy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
5
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.8%
6
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 10%
2.1%
7
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 37%
1.9%
8
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
9
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.9%
10
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.8%
11
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.7%
12
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.5%
13
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
14
Laboratory Investigation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
15
Biological Imaging
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
16
BMC Methods
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
17
Journal of Visualized Experiments
30 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
18
Journal of Cell Science
353 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
19
Journal of Cell Biology
333 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
20
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
21
STAR Protocols
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
22
Journal of Biomedical Optics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
23
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.7%
24
Patterns
70 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
25
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
26
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.5%
27
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
28
Biomedical Optics Express
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
29
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
30
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%