Intracranial Insights into the Developing Neural Basis of Moral Punishment
Hu, K.; Zhang, H.; Cheng, J.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, X.; Bai, C.; Wang, F.; Yao, Y.; Wu, H.
Show abstract
Third-party punishment (TPP) is a critical component of social regulation and justice, in-tegrating moral reasoning and emotional salience. However, the neural developmental basis underpinning this complex process remains largely unknown. Using rare intracranial stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) in 14 children and 17 adults, we investigated the developing neural circuits of TPP. We found that broad-band gamma activity in the amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) encodes inferred intentions, with different patterns across age groups. Furthermore, the vmPFC, insula, and inferior parietal lobule (IPL) integrate punishment efficacy, also showing significant developmental differences. Combining task and resting state functional connectivity analyses, we further found age-dependent interactions among the amygdala-insula and IPL-vmPFC neural couplings during decision-making. These findings provide valuable intracranial evidence that the maturation of moral decision-making stems from the developmental refinement of subcortical-cortical circuits that integrate emotional and cognitive evaluations, explaining the shift from intuitive decisions in children to context-sensitive judgments in adults.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Neural interactions in the human frontal cortex dissociate reward and punishment learning 94%
- Distinct population and single-neuron selectivity for executive and episodic processing in human dorsal posterior cingulate 94%
- Dissecting the chain of information processing and its interplay with neurochemicals and fluid intelligence across development 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.