The contribution of RBM20 truncating variants to human cardiomyopathy
Floyd, B. J.; Njoroge, J. N.; Krysov, V. A.; Gomes, B.; Murtha, R.; Aribeana, C.; Cannie, D.; Smith, E.; Paldino, A.; Brown, E. E.; Barth, A.; Ilhan, E.; Johnson, R.; Wojciak, J.; Alkhayat, M.; Graw, S.; Medo, K.; Haas, J.; Chahal, C. A. A.; Fenzl, K.; Steinmetz, L.; Gollob, M.; Ashley, E. A.; Day, S.; Judge, D.; Roberts, J.; Vedantham, V.; Mao, C. Y.; Fatkin, D.; Lakdawala, N. K.; Taylor, M. R. G.; Mestroni, L.; Saguner, A. M.; Tayal, U.; Cadrin-Tourigny, J.; Krahn, A. D.; James, C.; Dal Ferro, M.; Sinagra, G.; Merlo, M.; Owens, A.; Reza, N.; Saberi, S.; Helms, A.; Elliott, P.; Meder, B.; Par
Show abstract
BackgroundGenetic diagnosis has become increasingly important to guide clinical decision making for patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). Disease-causing (P/LP) missense variants in the gene RBM20 cause a highly penetrant arrhythmogenic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), but the role of truncating RBM20 variants (RBM20tvs) is unclear. ObjectiveAssess the contribution of RBM20tvs to DCM. MethodsWe assembled an international cohort of DCM patients with RBM20 variants and used data from the genome-first UK Biobank (UKB) to assess the etiologic fraction, natural history and penetrance of RBM20tvs. ResultsThe etiologic fraction of RBM20tvs in arrhythmogenic DCM was modest (0.53[0.32,0.67], p=7.5x10-5). RBM20tv DCM patients presented to referral centers later in life than RBM20 P/LP DCM patients (53{+/-}10 vs. 34{+/-}18 years, p=4x10-3), and were less likely to have a family history of sudden cardiac arrest (20% vs. 65%, p= 0.046) or cardiomyopathy (20% vs. 78% p=5.4x10-3). There was no significant difference in age- and sex-adjusted incident major heart failure or arrhythmia events between RBM20tv and RBM20 P/LP DCM patients, though sex-adjusted lifetime hazard was reduced in RBM20tv DCM (HR 0.15[0.03,0.66],p=0.009). In UKB, lifetime incidence of cardiomyopathy, heart failure, or major ventricular arrhythmia diagnosis was lower in participants with RBM20tvs than in those with TTNtvs (HR 0.55 [0.36,0.84], p=5.9x10-3). ConclusionsRBM20tvs contribute to arrhythmogenic DCM phenotypes, but confer milder disease severity alone than RBM20 P/LP variants, and reduced lifetime disease penetrance compared to TTNtvs. Their potential for additive interactions with other damaging variants should be considered in DCM patients and families.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- ClinGen Hereditary Cardiovascular Disease Gene Curation Expert Panel: Reappraisal of Genes associated with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy 95%
- Prevalence and clinical importance of titin truncating variants in adults without known congestive heart failure 93%
- Comparative Effectiveness of Second-line Antihyperglycemic Agents for Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Large-scale, Multinational, Federated Analysis of the LEGEND-T2DM Study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy -- The Impact of Age at Diagnosis of the Proband on Genetic Yield, Clinical Presentation, Outcomes, and Yield of Family Screening 95%
- Development and validation of imaging-free myocardial fibrosis prediction models, association with outcomes, and sample size estimation for phase 3 trials 94%
- Pathogenic and uncertain genetic variants have clinical cardiac correlates in diverse biobank participants 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genome wide association analysis in dilated cardiomyopathy reveals two new key players in systolic heart failure on chromosome 3p25.1 and 22q11.23 95%
- Endurance exercise remodels pulmonary vein sleeve myocytes and promotes a proarrhythmic atrial substrate 93%
- Clinical presentation, disease course and outcome of COVID-19 in hospitalized patients with and without pre-existing cardiac disease – a cohort study across sixteen countries 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.