Back

Dynamic Reworking of Marine Diatom Endometabolomes

Olofsson, M.; Uchimiya, M.; Ferrer-Gonzalez, F. X.; Schreier, J. E.; Powers, M. A.; Smith, C. B.; Edison, A. S.; Moran, M. A.

2025-07-31 ecology
10.1101/2025.07.25.666871 bioRxiv
Show abstract

A large annual carbon flux occurs through the oceans labile dissolved organic carbon (DOC) pool, with carbon influx dominated by phytoplankton-derived metabolites and outflux by heterotrophic bacterioplankton uptake. We addressed the dynamics of this flux between marine primary and secondary producers through analysis of the Thalassiosira pseudonana CCMP1335 endometabolome, a proxy for labile DOC release during phytoplankton excretion and mortality. Diatom strains acclimated at one of three different temperatures (14{degrees}C, 20{degrees}C, or 28{degrees}C) were then cultured either axenically or with the bacterium Ruegeria pomeroyi DSS-3, and their endometabolites analyzed by NMR. Osmolytes were by far the most dynamic, exhibiting concentration differences up to 150-fold between conditions; median concentration variation across identified endometabolites was [~]1.5-fold. Differential expression of diatom metabolic pathways suggested changes in synthesis rates as a mechanism for endometabolome remodeling. Consistent with expectations of high turnover, endometabolite mean lifetimes prior to bacterial uptake were <2 h to 12 h. ImportanceThe role of labile DOC in the transfer of marine carbon between phytoplankton and heterotrophic bacteria was first recognized 40 years ago, yet the identity and dynamics of phytoplankton metabolites entering the labile DOC pool are still poorly known. Using metabolome and transcriptome profiling, we found dynamic composition and concentration of diatom endometabolites, depending on growth conditions and arising over time frames as short as a single growth cycle. This strong response to external conditions, both biotic and abiotic, has implications for downstream processing and fate of ocean carbon by heterotrophic bacteria.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.