Back

Investigation of allele-specific expression in citrus hybrids reveals the association between siRNA-mediated de novo methylation and high expression in citrus genomes

DIOP, K.; Bonnin, m.; Gibert, A.; Llauro, C.; Froelicher, Y.; Hufnagel, B.; Picault, N.; Pontvianne, F.

2026-03-19 plant biology
10.1101/2025.07.25.666733 bioRxiv
Show abstract

DNA methylation plays a central role in the regulation of gene expression. In plants, methylation occurs in the CG, CHG and CHH contexts, via distinct DNA methyltransferases including MET1, CMT3 and the RNA-directed DNA Methylation (RdDM) pathway via DRM2. In interspecific hybrids, these epigenetic mechanisms are confronted to a mixed small RNA population and two subgenomes harbouring specific methylation patterns, therefore generating unique expression profiles. The aim of this work was to understand these regulations by analysing gene expression, DNA methylation and small RNAs in a Citrus hybrid resulting from the cross between C. reticulata (mandarin) and C. australasica (finger lime). Haplotype-resolved subgenomes assembly identified hundreds of allele-specifically expressed genes. Asymmetric reprogramming of methylation was observed, in particular an increase in CHH in C. australasica haplotype. Surprisingly, CHH methylation, usually associated with gene silencing, was correlated here with increased expression, but also 24nt small RNA populations at their promoter regions. Similar analyses of the parental lines and other citrus species suggest the correlation between CHH methylation-enriched promoter and high expression level is not due to the hybridization, but seem to be generally true for all citrus. These observations suggest that, in citrus fruit, RdDM could activate transcription. This work also provides a full pipeline to analyse the expression profiles and DNA methylation in complex hybrids, which could be crucial for anticipating varieties resistant to diseases and the current threats affecting citriculture such as the Huanglongbing disease.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
12.3%
2
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
9.9%
3
Horticulture Research
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.9%
4
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
7.1%
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 25%
7.1%
6
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.2%
8
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
9
Plant Biotechnology Journal
56 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.5%
10
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.6%
11
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 34%
2.3%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 49%
2.0%
13
The Plant Cell
141 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
14
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
15
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.6%
16
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.5%
17
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.5%
18
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 26%
1.5%
19
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.3%
20
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 67%
1.2%
21
Molecular Omics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
22
Plant Communications
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
23
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.1%
24
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
25
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
26
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.8%
27
Plant, Cell & Environment
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
28
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 35%
0.7%
29
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.6%