Fewer flights and lower community noise: Noise monitoring at six airports in the United States before, during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic
Seto, E.; Huang, C.-H. S.
Show abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in reduced air travel in the United States (US). In the ensuing years after the pandemic, air travel rebounded to near pre-pandemic levels. This provided an opportunity to assess the impact of fewer flights on community noise using monitoring data from six major airports in the US. Flight data for the airports were obtained from the US Department of Transportation (DOT) for the 5-year period before, during, and after the pandemic (2018-2022). Noise levels were assessed at monitoring sites surrounding airports (SFO, LAX, ORD, JFK, LGA, and EWR) in San Francisco, CA; Los Angeles, CA; Chicago, IL; New York City, NY; and Newark, NJ for the same period. Linear models and generalized additive models (GAMs) were used to investigate the changes in Lden and Ldn noise metrics by year and by flight operations. Percentage reduction in flights ranged from 43.9 - 56.2% less in the year of the pandemic (2020) compared to pre-pandemic peak levels. Average noise levels were also found to range from 3.0 - 5.4 dBA lower in 2020 compared to the peak levels before the pandemic. Both flight traffic and noise levels have increased since 2020. Linear regressions and GAMs both indicated lower noise levels at each airport during the pandemic, and associations between numbers of flights and noise levels. Based on linear models, the point estimate effect of air traffic on annual noise level was a 0.8 to 2.7 dBA change per 100,000 annual flights. These findings extend those of previous studies that have also documented noise reductions during the pandemic. This is one of the few studies that evaluated noise reductions in US airport communities in relationship to reduced air traffic across multiple years.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Aerosol tracer testing in Boeing 767 and 777 aircraft to simulate exposure potential of infectious aerosol such as SARS-CoV-2 94%
- The impact of heating, ventilation, and air conditioning design features on the transmission of viruses, including the 2019 novel coronavirus: a systematic review of ultraviolet radiation 91%
- Ventilation during COVID-19 in a school for students with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Computational Fluid Dynamics Modeling of Cough Transport in an Aircraft Cabin 93%
- Short-term change in air pollution following the COVID-19 state of emergency: A national analysis for the United States 92%
- Aerosol emission rates from playing wind instruments – Implications for COVID-19 transmission during music performance 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Experimental efficacy of the face shield and the mask against emitted and potentially received particles 92%
- The impact of large mobile air purifiers on aerosol concentration in classrooms and the reduction of airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 92%
- Short-term acute exposure to wildfire smoke and lung function in a Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) cohort 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessment of Environmental and Occupational Risk Factors for the Mitigation and Containment of a COVID-19 Outbreak in a Meat Processing Plant 91%
- Providing a safe, in-person, residential college experience during the COVID-19 pandemic 88%
- COVIDHunter: An Accurate, Flexible, and Environment-Aware Open-Source COVID-19 Outbreak Simulation Model 87%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.