Back

A study protocol for an interrupted time series analysis and pre-post surveys to assess the effects a community-wide sanitation system on environmental contamination, infection risk, and well-being in the Alabama Black Belt

Harmon, O. A.; Lott, M. E. J.; Holcomb, D. A.; McGlohn, E.; Elliott, M.; White, K.; Brown, J.

2025-07-25 public and global health
10.1101/2025.07.25.25332164 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionRural sanitation deficits in the United States represent an important source of non-point source pollution and may present risks to public health. We propose an interrupted time series analysis to measure the effect of a town-wide sanitation expansion program on the release of pathogens to the environment. This work is expected to yield valuable insight into the potential for rural sanitation improvements to reduce pathogen releases and support public health and well-being. MethodsWe will conduct a longitudinal baseline study including quantitative measurement of key enteric pathogens and fecal indicator bacteria adjacent to households lacking adequate sanitation. As households connect to a new sewerage system serving the entire community, longitudinal household sampling will continue until crossover is complete. We will include concurrent comparison sites with existing appropriate sanitation as well as sites never receiving the intervention to monitor secular trends in pathogen releases during the study period. AnalysisWe will compare the concentration of culturable E. coli in the environment pre- and post-intervention using a time series regression analysis suitable for an interrupted time series. We will couple pathogen measurements with quantitative microbial risk assessment to estimate the potential effect of the intervention on infection risks via key exposure pathways. A linked pre-post survey will focus on self-reported quality of life measures among households connecting to the system. Ethics and disseminationInformed consent will be obtained prior to data collection, with participants informed of study details and risks. Participation is completely voluntary, and identifiable data will be securely and separately stored from all other data. Each household will be offered a summary of their site-specific data. Deidentified results will be shared with the community in a public forum and published in peer-reviewed journals. Strengths and Limitations of this StudyO_LIThis study utilizes both molecular and culture-based environmental sampling with structured household and observational surveys to carefully assess the effects of a community-wide sanitation system on environmental contamination, infection risk, and well-being. C_LIO_LITo address potential confounding due to secular trends and/or weather-related events, we plan to include at least 10 comparison sites with existing improved sanitation C_LIO_LIinfrastructure and 10 sites with poor sanitation infrastructure not receiving the intervention during the study period. C_LIO_LIBias will be reduced by defining enteric pathogen targets and the main statistical models prior to analysis. C_LIO_LIAlthough we will adjust for external trends such as temperature and rainfall, the design of an interrupted time series lacks a randomized control group, limiting the ability to fully isolate the intervention effect. C_LIO_LIVoluntary participation and required utility fees may lead to selection bias, and survey responses may be influenced by social desirability or courtesy bias. We aim to mitigate this through community engagement, confidentiality assurances, and validating survey responses with environmental testing. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 7%
22.7%
2
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 2%
9.8%
3
PLOS Water
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.0%
4
Environmental Health Perspectives
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
5
International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
128 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
5.6%
7
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.9%
8
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.5%
9
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
10
Environmental Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.2%
11
Environment International
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
12
American Journal of Epidemiology
67 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
13
GeoHealth
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
14
ACS ES&T Water
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
15
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
16
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
466 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
17
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.1%
18
BMJ Global Health
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
19
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
339 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
20
Journal of Environmental Management
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
21
Annals of Epidemiology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
22
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.6%
23
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 68%
0.6%
24
One Health
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
25
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 77%
0.6%
26
Malaria Journal
58 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.6%