A framework to infer de novo exonic variants when parental genotypes are missing enhances association studies of autism
Moon, H.; Sloofman, L.; Avila, M. N.; Klei, L.; Devlin, B.; Buxbaum, J.; Roeder, K.
Show abstract
MotivationGene-damaging mutations are highly informative for studies seeking to discover genes underlying developmental disorders. Traditionally, these de novo variants are recognized by evaluating high-quality DNA sequence from affected offspring and parents. However, when parental sequence is unavailable, methods are required to infer de novo status and use this inference for association studies. ResultsWe use data from autism spectrum disorder to illustrate and evaluate methods. Separating de novo from rare inherited variants is challenging because the latter are far more common. Using a classifier for unbalanced data and variants of known inheritance class, we build an inheritance model and then a de novo score for variants when parental data are missing. Next, we propose a new Random Draw (RD) model to use this score for gene discovery. Built into an existing inferential framework, RD produces a more powerful gene-based association test and controls the false discovery rate. Availability and ImplementationThe implementation code and publicly available data are provided at: https://github.com/HaeunM/TADA-RD.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Identifying novel associations in GWAS by hierarchical Bayesian latent variable detection of differentially misclassified phenotypes 92%
- Estimating the effect size of a hidden causal factor between SNPs and a continuous trait: a mediation model approach 92%
- HARVESTMAN: A framework for hierarchical featurelearning and selection from whole genome sequencingdata 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Association Tests Using Copy Number Profile Curves (CONCUR) Enhances Power in Rare Copy Number Variant Analysis 93%
- DeepPheno: Predicting single gene loss of function phenotypes 93%
- Model Checking via Testing for Direct Effects in Mendelian Randomization and Transcriptome-wide Association Studies 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.