Back

In vivo screening reveals cell-intrinsic mediators of solid tumor resistance to CAR T cell-therapy

Fröse, J.; Whittaker, C. A.; Leclerc, P.; Chen, E.; Doherty, S.; Langenbucher, A.; Hellinger, R. D.; Goulet, D.; Tammela, T.; Hemann, M. T.

2025-07-29 cancer biology
10.1101/2025.07.24.666408 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has transformed the treatment of hematologic cancers, but has shown limited efficacy in solid tumors, including pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The cellular and molecular factors that influence CAR T cell therapy response remain largely unknown. By integrating modular in vivo CRISPR screens with single cell genomics and immunocompetent orthotopic models of PDAC, we uncover oxidative and proteotoxic stress pathways as previously unknown tumor-intrinsic modulators of CAR T cell therapy response. Disruption of stress-regulatory genes, particularly Keap1 and Slc33a1, sensitizes PDAC tumors to CAR T cell killing in vivo. Mechanistically, hyperactivation of the Nrf2 pathway by genetic ablation of the Keap1 tumor suppressor or endogenous engineering of a clinically observed Keap1 mutation enhances tumor susceptibility to CAR T cell therapy. Thus, tumor-intrinsic molecular stress phenotypes accompanying malignant tumor progression can induce unexpected cell state-specific vulnerabilities to cell-based immunotherapies. These findings provide a mechanistic molecular foundation to improve the efficacy of CAR T cell therapy in solid malignancies and to better stratify cancer patients by tumor genotype. Statement of significanceCAR T cell therapy remains an unsolved challenge for pancreatic cancer. Factors that influence CAR-T cell therapy response remain largely unknown, in part due to lack of robust and scalable experimental models. By integrating in vivo genetic screens with single cell genomics in an orthotopic, immunocompetent model of pancreatic cancer, we uncover cell-intrinsic stress states as key regulators of CAR T cell response.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.