From Advice to Action: Real-World Behaviour of Patients Using an Integrated Clinical AI for Navigating the Healthcare System
Cotte, F.; Lourenco, F.; Pereira, M.; Kini, N.; Schmude, M.; Pimenta, A.; Lemesiou, A.; Gilbert, S.; Mehrali, T.; Monteiro, M.; Flores, P.
Show abstract
BackgroundAI-powered digital front-door (DFD) tools are increasingly used to guide patients to appropriate care and alleviate healthcare system pressure. Yet, most evaluations narrowly assess triage accuracy or stated intent, offering limited insight into real-world behaviour and care appropriateness. MethodsThe ESSENCE study was a prospective, real-world quality improvement evaluation embedded in Portugals largest private healthcare network (CUF). Adults using the Ada Health clinical AI (cAI) via the myCUF app reported their care intent before and after symptom assessment. Actual behaviour was tracked through electronic health records and follow-up surveys. Physician panels retrospectively assessed the appropriateness of intended and observed care. ResultsOf 1,470 adult ([≥]18 years) participants (mean age 38.5 years; 57.7% female), 33% revised their planned choice of care immediately after assessment. Uncertainty dropped from 13% to 5%. Among 721 participants with follow-up, 59% changed their behaviour: 29% de-escalated, 17% escalated, and 13% resolved prior uncertainty. General practitioner (GP) visits more than doubled (42% vs. 19%), while specialist visits halved (30% vs. 57%). Overall, the proportion of appropriate care increased from 30% pre-assessment to 64% post-behaviour (p{square}<{square}0.001). Of those initially planning to visit the emergency department, 39% opted for alternative care. 93% of those followed up were later confirmed to have avoided unnecessary emergency department (ED) visits. ConclusionEmbedding AI symptom assessment into a DFD shifted both patient intentions and behaviours, reducing uncertainty and promoting more appropriate healthcare use. These findings highlight the value of AI not only in generating accurate recommendations, but also in shaping real-world decision-making. Future research should identify specific factors that influence behaviour and evaluate impact across diverse healthcare settings.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving local authority financial support services for users with complex health needs: a mixed-method economic evaluation of Social Navigators in South Tyneside, UK 93%
- Interventions To Improve Patient Safety During The COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review 92%
- An observational study of survival outcomes of people referred for ‘fast-track’ end-of-life care funding in a District General Hospital; too little too late? 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Implementation of predictive risk stratification to reduce emergency admissions to hospital: experiences of general practitioners and practice managers 95%
- OpenSAFELY NHS Service Restoration Observatory 1: describing trends and variation in primary care clinical activity for 23.3 million patients in England during the first wave of COVID-19 94%
- Changes in General Practice use and costs with COVID-19 and telehealth initiatives 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Patients’ and carers’ experiences of, and engagement with remote home monitoring services for COVID-19 patients: a rapid mixed-methods study 94%
- Challenges of visibility and inclusion in Long COVID: a population-based interview study 92%
- “I don’t know what to do or where to go”. Experiences of accessing healthcare support from the perspectives of people living with Long Covid and healthcare professionals: A qualitative study in Bradford, UK 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Spatio-temporal modelling of referrals to outpatient respiratory clinics in the integrated care system of the Morecambe Bay area, England 92%
- Educational interventions delivered to prescribing advisers to influence primary care prescribing: a very low-cost pragmatic randomised trial using routine data from OpenPrescribing.net 92%
- Differences in medication reconciliation interventions between six hospitals: a mixed method study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Benefits and Challenges of Using Virtual Primary Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: From Key Lessons to a Framework for Implementation 94%
- Feasibility characteristics of wrist-worn fitness trackers in health status monitoring for post-COVID patients in remote and rural areas 93%
- The NASSS (Non-Adoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread and Sustainability) framework use over time: A scoping review 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.