Methods utilising routinely collected data for evaluating the effectiveness of population-level public health interventions to improve public awareness of cancer symptoms: protocol for a scoping review
Smith, M.; Ziyenge, S.; Friedemann Smith, C.; Friedemann Smith, C.; Nicholson, B. D.; Bankhead, C. R.
Show abstract
ObjectiveThe objective of this review is to understand the types of observational study designs and analyses that have been used to investigate the impact of public health interventions that aim to improve early diagnosis of cancer. IntroductionCampaigns to improve public awareness of cancer symptoms need to be evaluated at various stages in the cancer pathway. Inclusion criteriaAnalytic observational studies based on databases of routinely collected health data MethodsAbstracts in Ovid Medline and Embase and the Overton policy database from 2010 to the present will be extracted. Full text of potentially relevant sources will be screened. Covidence software will be used to manage the screening and data extraction process. Extracted data will be tabulated and presented graphically. A narrative summary will accompany the tabulated results.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Psychological Impact of the Galleri Test (sIG(n)al): Protocol for a longitudinal evaluation of the psychological impact of receiving a cancer signal in the NHS-Galleri Trial 93%
- Large language model-based information extraction from free-text radiology reports: a scoping review protocol 93%
- Strategies used to manage overlap of primary study data by exercise-related overviews. Protocol for a systematic methodological review 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Study Protocol: LIAM Mc Trial (Linking In with Advice and supports for Men impacted by Metastatic cancer) 94%
- A Core Outcome Set to evaluate the impact of prognostication in people living with advanced cancer: an international consensus study 94%
- From many voices, one question: Community co-design of a population-based qualitative cancer research study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing awareness of blood cancer symptoms and barriers to symptomatic presentation: Measure development and results from a population survey in the UK 93%
- Landscape of Clinical Trials in Cancer Cachexia: Assessment of Trends From 1995-2024 91%
- Proportion of cancer cases and deaths attributable to potentially modifiable risk factors in Peru prior to the COVID-19 pandemic 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Using a Multilingual AI Care Agent to Reduce Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening: Higher FIT Test Adoption Among Spanish-Speaking Patients 91%
- Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based Chatbots in Promoting Health Behavioral Changes: A Systematic Review 91%
- Health indicators as a measure of individual health status: public perspectives 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- The TARCiS statement: Guidance on terminology, application, and reporting of citation searching 92%
- Analysing complex interventions using component network meta-analysis 89%
- Comparative effectiveness of ChAdOx1 versus BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccines in Health and Social Care workers in England: a cohort study using OpenSAFELY 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.