Deep Learning-Based Multi-View Echocardiographic Framework for Comprehensive Diagnosis of Pericardial Disease
Jeong, S.; Moon, I.; Jeon, J.; Jeong, D.; Lee, J.; kim, J.; Lee, S.-A.; Jang, Y.; Yoon, Y. E.; Chang, H.-J.
Show abstract
BackgroundPericardial disease spans a wide spectrum from small effusions to life-threatening tamponade or constriction. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is the main diagnostic tool, but its interpretation is limited by operator dependence and incomplete functional assessment. Existing deep learning (DL) models focus mainly on effusion detection, lacking broader evaluation. MethodsWe developed a DL-based framework that performs sequential assessment of pericardial disease: (1) morphological features, including effusion amount (normal/small/moderate/large) and pericardial thickening/adhesion (yes/no), from five B-mode views, and (2) hemodynamic significance (yes/no), incorporating Doppler and inferior vena cava measurements. The developmental dataset comprises 2,253 TTEs from multiple Korean institutions (225 for internal testing), and the independent external test set consists of 274 TTEs. ResultsIn the internal test set, diagnostic accuracy was 81.8-97.3% for effusion, 91.6% for thickening/adhesion, and 86.2% for hemodynamic significance. External test set accuracy was 80.3-94.2%, 94.5%, and 85.5%, respectively. Area under the receiver operating curves (AUROCs) for the three tasks was 0.92-0.99, 0.90, and 0.79 internally, and 0.95-0.98, 0.85, and 0.76 externally. Sensitivity for thickening/adhesion and hemodynamic significance improved from 66.7% to 77.3%, and 68.8% to 80.8%, respectively, when poor image quality were excluded. Similar performance gains were observed in subgroups with complete target views and a higher number of available video clips. ConclusionsThis study presents the first DL-based TTE model for broader pericardial disease evaluation, integrating morphological with supportive functional assessments. The proposed framework demonstrated strong generalizability and aligned with the real-world diagnostic workflow. However, caution is warranted when interpreting results under suboptimal imaging conditions.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Comprehensive Assessment of the Aortic Valve Stenosis Continuum in Echocardiography 96%
- Deep Learning Prediction of Biomarkers from Echocardiogram Videos 96%
- Annotation-free multi-organ anomaly detection in abdominal CT using free-text radiology reports: A multi-center retrospective study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The HeartMagic prospective observational study protocol - characterizing subtypes of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction 93%
- Non-Invasive Scale Measurement of Cardiac Output Compared with the Gold-Standard Direct Fick Method: A Feasibility Study 92%
- A Deep Learning Algorithm for Automated Cardiac Murmur Detection Via a Digital Stethoscope Platform 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.