Operational Framework and Feasibility of the GALFLU Study: A Pragmatic Individually Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating High-Dose Versus Standard-Dose Influenza Vaccination in Older Adults
Mallah, N.; Pardo-Seco, J.; Rodriguez-Tenreiro-Sanchez, C.; Gine-Vazquez, I.; Miras-Carballal, S.; Pineiro-Sotelo, M.; Cribeiro-Gonzalez, M.; Conde-Pajaro, M.; Gonalez-Perez, J.-M.; Razzini, J. L.; Dacosta-Urbieta, A.; Rivero-Calle, I.; Harris, R. C.; Loiacono, M. M.; van Aalst, R.; Farre, J. M.; Dufournet, M.; Johansen, N. D.; Modin, D.; Biering-Sorensen, T.; Duran-Parrondo, C.; Martinon-Torres, F.; GALFLU trial team,
Show abstract
BackgroundOptimizing influenza vaccination in older adults is a public health priority. While high-dose inactivated influenza vaccines (HD-IIV) have shown superior immunogenicity and efficacy over standard-dose vaccines (SD-IIV), there is a shortage of large-scale, individually randomized data evaluating real-world effectiveness against severe outcomes--especially within publicly funded health systems. MethodsGALFLU is a pragmatic, individually randomized, open-label clinical trial comparing HD-IIV and SD-IIV in adults aged 65-79 years in Galicia, Spain, during the 2023-2024 and 2024-2025 influenza seasons. The trial embedded individual randomization into the regional vaccination program and exploited digital health registries for comprehensive, low-burden data collection under real-world conditions. The primary outcome is relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) against a composite of influenza- or pneumonia-related hospitalizations. Secondary and exploratory outcomes include rVE against cardio-respiratory disease, laboratory-confirmed influenza, all-cause hospitalization, mortality, and healthcare utilization. ResultsGALFLU successfully demonstrated the feasibility of large-scale, pragmatic randomized controlled trials within routine clinical practice. Across both seasons, 133,822 participants were randomized (59,490 in 2023/24 and 74,986 in 2024/25), typically within 4-5 weeks per season. Automated linkage ensured >99% follow-up using electronic clinical and laboratory registries. ConclusionsGALFLU provides an effective, scalable operational framework for generating robust real-world evidence through pragmatic, individually randomized trials embedded in public health systems. This model serves as a blueprint for future vaccine evaluations, supports regulatory and policy decisions with high-quality, population-level data, and illustrates the evolution toward "learning health systems" that integrate pragmatic trials within routine care.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Pay-it-forward to improve influenza vaccine uptake and public engagement among children and older adults in China 95%
- Vaccine effectiveness of two and three doses of BNT162b2 and CoronaVac against COVID-19 in Hong Kong 94%
- Safety and immunogenicity of a SARS-CoV-2 recombinant protein vaccine with AS03 adjuvant in healthy adults: interim findings from a phase 2, randomised, dose-finding, multi-centre study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effectiveness of vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 infection and Covid-19 hospitalization among Finnish elderly and chronically ill – An interim analysis of a nationwide cohort study 94%
- Factors indicating intention to vaccinate with a COVID-19 vaccine among older U.S. Adults 94%
- Is the BioNTech-Pfizer COVID-19 vaccination effective in elderly populations? Results from population data from Bavaria, Germany 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effectiveness of Rosuvastatin plus Colchicine, Emtricitabine/Tenofovir and a combination of them in Hospitalized Patients with SARS Covid-19 93%
- Safety and Immunogenicity of an Inactivated Recombinant Newcastle Disease Virus Vaccine Expressing SARS-CoV-2 Spike: Interim Results of a Randomised, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 1/2 Trial 92%
- Early treatment with nitazoxanide prevents worsening of mild and moderate COVID-19 and subsequent hospitalization 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.