Spatial factors predict variation in reports of human-wildlife interactions but not public attitudes towards a widespread urban carnivore, the red fox
Adaway, K.; Hopkins, C.; Soulsbury, C.; Morton, B.
Show abstract
Despite growing recognition that spatial factors such as urbanisation and geographic region shape human-wildlife interactions, few studies have examined - on a large geographic scale - how spatial factors reflect the subjective human dimensions to those interactions, including public attitudes and self-reported encounters with wildlife. Understanding how spatial factors shape these dimensions may have implications for urban rewilding because they can reflect local tolerance of animals and may potentially predict human-wildlife interactions. We examined how urbanisation type and geographic region are related to peoples attitudes, reported encounters (public feeding and bin-raiding), and reported use of control measures towards the worlds most urbanised terrestrial carnivore, the red fox, Vulpes vulpes. Online survey data were obtained from 1,275 participants in the United Kingdom. Reports of fox bin-raiding were associated with increased reports of wildlife feeding, more negative attitudes towards foxes, and greater reported use of professional and do-it-yourself control measures. However, the role of spatial factors varied among these relationships. Specifically, urbanisation and geographic region significantly predicted reports of fox binraiding, with urban residents - particularly from London - more likely to report such behaviour. Urbanisation predicted reports of wildlife feeding and use of professional pest control of foxes within their area. Geographic region predicted reports of do-it-yourself control measures. Neither urbanisation nor geographic region significantly predicted public attitudes towards foxes. Together, these findings highlight the complex interactions between spatial context and the subjective human dimensions of wildlife interactions, underscoring the importance of nuanced, context-specific strategies to support human-wildlife coexistence and urban rewilding initiatives. HighlightsO_LIUrban rewilding success depends on public tolerance of local wildlife. C_LIO_LIWe studied spatial factors and subjective human dimensions of fox interactions. C_LIO_LIReports of bin-raiding, wildlife feeding, fox-related attitudes, and pest control covaried. C_LIO_LIThe role of urbanisation and geography varied in predicting these reports. C_LIO_LISuch spatial complexity should be considered in designing urban rewilding strategies. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Insights from two decades of the Student Conference on Conservation Science 93%
- Terrain ruggedness and human activities influence the distribution of Grauer's gorillas (Gorilla beringei graueri) and eastern chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) in the Tayna Nature Reserve, Democratic Republic of Congo 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating diversionary feeding as a method to resolve conservation conflicts in a recovering ecosystem. 94%
- Using animal tracking for early detection of mass poisoning events 93%
- Movement-integrated habitat selection reveals wolves balance ease of travel with human avoidance in a risk-reward trade-off 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Tolerance of Wildlife in Protected Area Borderlands 94%
- Evaluating key evidence and formulating regulatory alternatives regarding the UK Hunting Trophies (Import Prohibition) Bill 92%
- Estimating home range and temporal space use variability reveals age-related differences in risk exposure for reintroduced parrots 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- From Concrete to Canopy: Illuminating Moth Biodiversity in New York City's Urban Jungle 93%
- Accessibility and allocation of public parks and gardens during COVID-19 social distancing in England and Wales 93%
- Everything Under Control? Comparing Knepp Estate rewilding project with 'traditional nature conservation 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.