Projecting individualized probabilities of lifetime all-cancer risk
Butala, N.; Al-Hammadi, N.; Ediriwickrema, A.; Schneider, J.; Fullerton, A.; Balasubramanian, J.; Pal Choudhury, P.; Chatterjee, N.
Show abstract
IntroductionTechnological advances and direct-to-consumer marketing have unearthed significant organic demand from patients for cancer screening and prevention. However, in the absence of strong data or guidelines, physicians have minimal support on how to approach patients in clinical practice. MethodsWe projected individualized probabilities of 10-year and lifetime cancer risk across a population as well as potential improvement with healthy behaviors in the UK Biobank. ResultsA total of 118 distinct variables were included across 38 cancer-specific models. The distribution of lifetime cancer risk had a rightward skew and wide variation for both men and women. The median lifetime cancer risk was 29.5% for men (interquartile range (IQR) 8.4%) and 21.0% for women (IQR 8.8%). If all modifiable risk factors were set to the ideal state, this decreased to 20.5% for men (IQR 3.9%) and 16.5% for women (IQR 4.9%). There was considerable overlap between age groups, with men aged 50-59 at the 90th percentile having greater risk (11.9%) than men aged 60-70 at the 25th percentile (11.8%), and women aged 40-49 at the 90th percentile having greater risk (7.4%) than women aged 50-59 at the 60th percentile (6.8%) and women aged 60-70 at the 20th percentile (7.3%). ConclusionsLifetime cancer risk varies widely across the UK Biobank cohort, but this risk decreases substantially with healthy behaviors. There was considerable overlap in 10-year cancer risk between age groups, suggesting that future multicancer screening guidelines should account for more than age and sex as more evidence becomes available in the future.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Cancer and the risk of COVID-19 diagnosis, hospitalisation, and death: a population-based multi-state cohort study including 4,618,377 adults in Catalonia, Spain 94%
- Methylation scores for smoking, alcohol consumption, and body mass index and risk of seven types of cancer 93%
- Inequalities in relative cancer survival by race, immigration status, income, and education for 22 cancer sites in Canada, a cohort study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A new colorectal cancer risk prediction model incorporating family history, personal and environmental factors 94%
- Hereditary haemochromatosis beyond liver cancer: increased risk of prostate cancer during an 11-year follow-up 94%
- A Quantitative Framework to Study Potential Benefits and Harms of Multi-cancer Early Detection Testing 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Associations of the 2018 World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute of Cancer Research (WCRF/AICR) Cancer Prevention Recommendations with Stages of Colorectal Carcinogenesis 92%
- Restriction site associated DNA sequencing for tumour mutation burden estimation and mutation signature analysis 89%
- Combination of hotspot mutations with methylation and fragmentomic profiles to enhance Multi-Cancer Early Detection 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Observational and genetic associations between cardiorespiratory fitness and cancer: a UK Biobank and international consortia study 93%
- Cost-effectiveness of CA125- and age-informed risk-based triage for ovarian cancer detection in primary care 92%
- BRCA-DIRECT digital pathway for diagnostic germline genetic testing within a UK breast oncology setting: a randomised, non-inferiority trial 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.