A mismatch between slow protein synthesis and fast environmental fluctuations determines tradeoffs in bacterial proteome allocation strategies
Cremer, J.; Perez, L.
Show abstract
Microbes live in environments that fluctuate faster than they can adjust their cellular machinery. To survive these fluctuations, they must dynamically regulate protein synthesis--a resource-intensive process that is often slower than environmental changes. Here, we develop a mechanistic model coupling antibiotic kinetics with dynamic proteome allocation to understand how limitations in translational capacity shape acclimation strategies. Using translation-inhibiting antibiotics and resistance proteins, we show that the temporal mismatch between environmental perturbations (seconds) and protein synthesis responses (hours) creates a growth advantage for anticipatory strategies where cells pre-synthesize resistance proteins before antibiotic exposure. Further, we find that the largest benefits of anticipation and the largest protein fractions reserved for anticipation are realized in environments with multiple antibiotics, suggesting that anticipation is most important in complex environments. This work establishes a framework for quantifying the costs and benefits of various acclimation strategies in dynamical environments based on the fundamental constraints of protein synthesis, with implications for microbial ecology, antibiotic resistance, and biotechnology applications.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Cell growth model with stochastic gene expression helps understand the growth advantage of metabolic exchange and auxotrophy 96%
- From modules to networks: A systems-level analysis of the bacitracin stress response in Bacillus subtilis 94%
- Chaperone-mediated stress-sensing in Mycobacterium tuberculosis enables fast activation and sustained response 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.