Back

The fitness consequences of coinfection and reassortment for segmented viruses depend upon viral genetic structure

Farjo, M.; Brooke, C. B.

2025-07-26 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2025.07.22.666171 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cellular coinfection between multiple virions is a common feature of viral infections. The collective virus-virus interactions enabled by these coinfections can influence the fitness of viral populations and give rise to novel infection phenotypes. Multi-strain coinfections allow viral resources to be shared between multiple individuals, and enable genetic combination and recombination between genotypes, potentially giving rise to hybrid progeny with enhanced fitness. However, coinfection can also impose fitness costs in certain situations. For example, resource sharing among viruses can lead to the persistence of low-fitness genotypes, and reassortment between different strains can lead to negative inter-segment epistasis when genes are poorly matched to one another. Thus, the fitness implications of cellular coinfection are poorly defined and likely context dependent. To investigate the specific conditions that lead to positive or negative fitness consequences for multi-strain coinfections, we formulated a model in which different genotypes of a three-segment virus replicate under varying degrees of inter-strain mixing. We observed that increased mixing had negative fitness consequences under a variety of scenarios, and that this effect was exacerbated with increasing genetic divergence between strains. Inter-strain mixing only enhanced viral fitness (a) when positive genetic dominance interactions were at play, and (b) under very specific conditions of selective pressure. We also observed that reassortment arising from mixing could generate hybrid genotypes with higher fitness than either parental virus, but that these outcomes were relatively rare. Overall, using a model segmented virus, we found that the heterologous coinfection was deleterious under most conditions, suggesting that it may be beneficial for many viruses to limit the extent of cellular coinfection.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Virus Evolution
140 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
32.3%
2
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 1%
10.2%
3
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.2%
4
Journal of Virology
456 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
5
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 21%
3.5%
6
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
7
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 32%
2.7%
8
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.5%
9
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
10
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.8%
11
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.8%
12
Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
13
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
14
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.7%
15
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
16
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
17
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
18
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
19
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
20
The ISME Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
21
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 67%
1.2%
22
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
23
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
24
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.8%
25
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.7%
26
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.6%