Back

Sociodemographic Determinants of Fruit and Vegetable Consumption in Indonesia: Insights from the 2023 Indonesian Health Survey

Amini, A.; Kusumaningrum, F. M.; Purwaningrum, D. N.; Wahab, A.; Ramadona, A. L.

2025-07-22 public and global health
10.1101/2025.07.22.25331981 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveInadequate fruit and vegetable consumption is a recognized risk factor for non-communicable diseases. This study aimed to identify the sociodemographic determinants of fruit and vegetable consumption in Indonesia, which would be fundamental to developing targeted public health interventions for non-communicable diseases. MethodsThis cross-sectional study utilized secondary data from the 2023 Indonesian Health Survey. We analyzed the data from 595.303 adults aged above 19 years old, comprising variables of fruit and vegetables consumption and sociodemographic determinants. A logistic regression analysis is conducted to examine associations between sociodemographic factors and fruit and vegetable consumption. ResultsA significant majority of Indonesians (97.1%) fail to meet the recommended intake of fruits and vegetables. Better fruit and vegetable consumption patterns were observed among females (aOR=1.31; 95% CI=1.24-1.38), individuals with higher education (aOR=1.47; 95% CI=1.23-1.75), those employed (aOR=1.13; 95% CI=1.06-1.20), married (aOR=1.25; 95% CI=1.16-1.34), from lower economic status groups, and residents of Nusa Tenggara (aOR=1.32; 95% CI=1.13-1.53), Maluku (aOR=1.54; 95% CI=1.16-2.06), Papua (aOR=1.95; 95% CI=1.46-2.60), and rural areas (aOR=1.12; 95% CI=1.02-1.23). ConclusionIndonesians consume very few fruits and vegetables, and this low consumption isnt uniform. We see significant differences based on factors like sex, education, occupation, marital status, socioeconomic status, and where people live (both urban/rural and specific residential areas). This makes it clear that we urgently need targeted nutrition campaigns and flexible public health policies.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.