Temporal coordination of tissue transformation, olfactory sensory neural development and central axon projections through morphogens
Chen, S.-C.; Lu, T.-M.; Lin, C.-T.; Low, I. Z. Q.; Chou, Y.-H.
Show abstract
During development, sensory neurons arise in the peripheral sensory organ in close spatial and temporal coordination with the dynamic morphological transformation of the sensory organ in the central nervous system. Moreover, intricate coordination exists between the peripheral map and the central map. Yet, it remains largely unclear what mechanisms are responsible for orchestrating such coordination and whether these mechanisms might be evolutionarily conserved. Here, we performed a systematic analysis of the sensory organ transformation process, defining the expression patterns of morphogens and their receptors at multiple developmental stages and creating receptor mutants in sensory neurons and projections. These experiments revealed combinatorial codes of morphogens that are utilized to coordinate sensory circuit development. Remarkably, two distinct strategies were likely deployed by different morphogen families, including a two-step strategy (same ligand from different sources at two different stages) and a ligand switch strategy (different ligands at two different stages). Significance StatementTissue transformation, dissociation and integration occur in all species. However, it remains largely unclear how such transformations are coordinated with cell fate determination, local cell migration and axonal guidance both temporally and spatially. We found Drosophila antennal discs undergo a series of tissue transformation steps to develop a three-dimensional structure from a two-dimensional neuroepithelium. During this tissue transformation, olfactory sensory neurons acquire their distinct cell types and project their axons to specific targets in the antennal lobe. The whole process is temporally and spatially coordinated by combinatorial codes of morphogens.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Metamorphosis of memory circuits in Drosophila reveal a strategy for evolving a larval brain. 97%
- The NDNF-like factor Nord is a Hedgehog-induced extracellular BMP modulator that regulates Drosophila wing patterning and growth 97%
- Sticks and Stones, a conserved cell surface ligand for the Type IIa RPTP Lar, regulates neural circuit wiring in Drosophila 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Hedgehog produced by the Drosophila wing imaginal disc induces distinct expression responses in three target tissues 97%
- Toll receptors mediate tissue intrinsic surveillance against aberrant cells by detecting cell fate aberrations 96%
- Shaking hands is a putative terminal selector and controls axon outgrowth of central complex neurons in the insect model Tribolium 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Interdependent regulation of stereotyped and stochastic photoreceptor fates in the fly eye 97%
- A dynamic cell recruitment process drives growth of the Drosophila wing by overscaling the Vestigial expression pattern 96%
- The Drosophila MLR COMPASS-like complex regulates bantam miRNA expression differentially in the context of cell fate 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Hox genes are essential for the development of novel serial homologous eyespots on the wings of Bicyclus anynana butterflies 96%
- Imaginal disc growth factors are Drosophila Chitinase-like Proteins with roles in morphogenesis and CO2 response 96%
- Activation of a Src-JNK pathway in unscheduled endocycling cells of the Drosophila wing disc induces a chronic wounding response 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- α-Phenylalanyl tRNA synthetase competes with Notch signaling through its N-terminal domain 96%
- Regenerative growth is constrained by brain tumor to ensure proper patterning in Drosophila 96%
- Specification of the endocrine primordia controlling insect moulting and metamorphosis by the JAK/STAT signalling pathway 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.