Back

AlphaGEM Enables Precise Genome-Scale Metabolic Modelling by Integrating Protein Structure Alignment with deep-learning-based Dark Metabolism Mining

Han, W.; Xiao, L.; Sun, H.; Xiang, G.; Jia, Q.; Wang, H.; Ji, B.; Zhang, C.; Kerkhoven, E. J.; Nielsen, J.; Lu, H.

2025-07-24 bioinformatics
10.1101/2025.07.21.665674 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Constructing high-quality genome-scale metabolic models (GEMs) for less-studied species remains challenging. To address this, we developed AlphaGEM, a versatile toolbox leveraging proteome-scale structural alignment and deep-learning-based predictions for efficient genomic mining to generate GEMs ready for applications. Our findings show that the structural alignment or protein-language-model-based prediction (i.e., PLMSearch), could identify more homologous protein relationships than sequence-blast-based alignment, contributing to the accurate profiling of metabolism from target organisms. Additionally, AlphaGEM encompasses an ensemble procedure empowered by multiple deep learning toolboxes to effectively mine the dark metabolic functions encoded by nonhomologous proteins, significantly expanding species-specific metabolic networks. We demonstrate AlphaGEMs accuracy by building GEMs for eukaryotes (e.g., S. pombe, C. albicans) and prokaryotes (e.g., K. pneumoniae, B. subtilis), achieving predictions comparable to manually curated models while outperforming existing tools. AlphaGEM also successfully reconstructs GEMs for M. musculus and C. griseus, showcasing its great potential for uncovering dark metabolism in complex mammals. Lastly, we demonstrate that AlphaGEM could facilitate the automatic GEMs reconstruction for 332 distinct yeast species with high prediction fidelity. In conclusion, AlphaGEM provides unprecedented opportunities for the precise, rapid construction of GEMs across diverse domains, which sets a solid foundation for universal functional analysis of non-model organisms having genome sequences available.

Published in Nature Communications (predicted rank #1) · training set

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.