Back

Contradictory task demands among junior physicians during post-graduate training: An explorative, multi-methods study

Weigl, M.; Boehm, S.; Quartucci, C.

2025-07-22 occupational and environmental health
10.1101/2025.07.21.25331908
Show abstract

IntroductionJunior physicians often face high levels of work stress, burnout, and depression, largely due to challenging work conditions. Contradictory task demands - a specific job stressor where junior physicians are expected to fulfill conflicting goals simultaneously - has received limited attention, but may significantly impact their mental health and job satisfaction. ObjectiveThis study aimed to identify key contradictory demands faced by junior physicians in specialty training and examine associations with physician health and well-being. MethodsStep-wise and multi-methods procedure comprising explorative interviews and standardized surveys. A convenience sample of junior physicians undergoing specialty training in Germany were surveyed. Thematic analyses of qualitative data as well as descriptive and bivariate analyses were performed. ResultsDrawing upon seven in-depth interviews, experiences of key contradictory demands were extracted and consolidated into 19 distinct statements. 28 Survey responses were obtained with highest ratings for Non-physician activities, additional tasks versus Focus on core clinical tasks as well as General workload versus Regular working time. Associations with physicians health and well-being outcomes were moderate and inconsistent. DiscussionPreliminary results shed light on experiences of contradictory task demands in clinical work among junior physicians. A broad spectrum of potentially incompatible or conflicting demands on the job was observed. The findings underscore the complexity of the clinical work environment, where multiple conflicting demands create a particularly challenging educational and work setting for junior physicians. The results may inform tailored approaches to mitigate work stress in this professional group.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.