Contradictory task demands among junior physicians during post-graduate training: An explorative, multi-methods study
Weigl, M.; Boehm, S.; Quartucci, C.
Show abstract
IntroductionJunior physicians often face high levels of work stress, burnout, and depression, largely due to challenging work conditions. Contradictory task demands - a specific job stressor where junior physicians are expected to fulfill conflicting goals simultaneously - has received limited attention, but may significantly impact their mental health and job satisfaction. ObjectiveThis study aimed to identify key contradictory demands faced by junior physicians in specialty training and examine associations with physician health and well-being. MethodsStep-wise and multi-methods procedure comprising explorative interviews and standardized surveys. A convenience sample of junior physicians undergoing specialty training in Germany were surveyed. Thematic analyses of qualitative data as well as descriptive and bivariate analyses were performed. ResultsDrawing upon seven in-depth interviews, experiences of key contradictory demands were extracted and consolidated into 19 distinct statements. 28 Survey responses were obtained with highest ratings for Non-physician activities, additional tasks versus Focus on core clinical tasks as well as General workload versus Regular working time. Associations with physicians health and well-being outcomes were moderate and inconsistent. DiscussionPreliminary results shed light on experiences of contradictory task demands in clinical work among junior physicians. A broad spectrum of potentially incompatible or conflicting demands on the job was observed. The findings underscore the complexity of the clinical work environment, where multiple conflicting demands create a particularly challenging educational and work setting for junior physicians. The results may inform tailored approaches to mitigate work stress in this professional group.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Physiotherapy Under Pressure: A Cross-Sectional Study on The Interplay Between Perfectionism, Moral Injury, and Burnout 95%
- High prevalence of burnout syndrome among medical and nonmedical residents during the COVID-19 pandemic 95%
- Predictors of Burnout Among Academic Family Medicine Faculty: Looking Back to Plan forward 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Occupational challenges of health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. A qualitative study 94%
- Physicians in the management and leadership of health care: A systematic review of the conditions conducive to organizational performance 93%
- Relationship Between Adverse Events Prevalence, Patient Safety Culture And Patient Safety Perception In A Single Sample Of Patients: A Cross-Sectional And Correlational Study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Healthcare workers’ perceptions and medically approved COVID-19 infection risk: understanding the mental health dimension of the pandemic. A German hospital case study 94%
- Migrant healthcare workers during COVID-19: bringing an intersectional health system-related approach into pandemic protection. A German case study 93%
- COVID-19 critical care simulations: An international cross-sectional survey 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The managerial role and psychosocial factors of job satisfaction: a cross-sectional study among Wittyfit’s users 96%
- On the frontlines in Shanghai: Stress, burnout and perceived benefit among COVID-19 testers and other personnel during the Omicron wave lockdown 94%
- Intensity of home-based telework and work engagement during the COVID-19 pandemic 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- How should job crafting interventions be implemented to make their effects last? Study protocol of group concept mapping 94%
- Secondary traumatic stress and burnout in healthcare workers during COVID-19 outbreak 93%
- Impostor Phenomenon in the Nutrition and Dietetics Profession: An Online Cross-Sectional Survey 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.