Back

The antigen presenting molecule MR1 binds riboflavin catabolites

Abdelaal, M.; Deng, J.; McInerney, M. P.; Ito, E.; Purcell, A. W.; Yamasaki, S.; Villadangos, J.; McWilliam, H. E. G.; Gherardin, N. A.; Rossjohn, J.; Awad, W.

2025-07-20 biochemistry
10.1101/2025.07.20.665728 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Major histocompatibility-complex (MHC) class I-related (MR1) protein presents vitamin B based antigens to Mucosal-Associated Invariant T (MAIT) cells. While microbial riboflavin precursors are well documented MR1 ligands, it is unclear whether host-generated riboflavin catabolites influence MR1-mediated immunity. Here, we report that riboflavin catabolites, including 10-formylmethylflavin (FMF), lumichrome, lumiflavin and alloxazine bind to MR1 with moderate affinity, while riboflavin itself binds weakly. In contrast to the microbial riboflavin antigens which increase MR1 cell surface expression, the riboflavin catabolites moderately reduced cell surface levels of MR1 by stabilizing and retaining MR1 in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). The riboflavin catabolites appeared to bind to the intracellular MR1 and inhibit MR1 exit from the ER. These riboflavin catabolites also weakly competed with Vit B based Ags for MR1 binding, thereby inhibiting MAIT cell activation. The crystal structures of MR1 complexed with riboflavin, FMF, lumichrome and lumiflavin, show binding of these three-ringed ligands in the A-pocket of MR1. The crystal structure of MR1-lumichrome revealed that lumichrome formed a covalent "flavin bond" with MR1-Lys43 differing from the typical Schiff-base bond of MR1-Lys43-Ag complexes. Collectively, we identified three ring isoalloxazines that can bind MR1 and downregulate cell surface expression levels, suggesting a potential role in dampening MAIT cell immunity.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.