Back

Functional Connectome of Superagers Reveals Early Markers of Resilience and Vulnerability to Alzheimers Disease

Zhao, K.; Xie, H.; Fonzo, G. A.; Carlisle, N. B.; Jacobs, T.; Osorio, R. S.; Church, A.; Lin, F. V.; Zhang, Y.

2025-07-22 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.07.20.665707 bioRxiv
Show abstract

As populations age, identifying the neurobiological basis of cognitive resilience is critical for delaying or preventing Alzheimers disease (AD). While most older adults experience memory decline, a subset known as superagers (SA) maintains youthful memory into late life, offering a unique window into protective mechanisms against neurodegeneration. Here, we identified a functional connectivity (FC) signature, termed Alzheimers-resilient connectome (ARC), that robustly differentiates SA from age-matched patients with AD. Using resting-state fMRI in a discovery cohort (N = 290), we identified ARC derived from machine learning classifiers that distinguished SA from AD with high accuracy (AUC = 0.85), and validated the replicability of the ARC in an independent replication cohort (N = 143). ARC involved prefrontal, temporal and insular networks and was strongly associated with brain age. When applied to cognitively unimpaired (CU) adults (discovery cohort: N = 818 and replication cohort: N = 497), ARC-based subtyping revealed SA-like and AD-like subgroups with similar baseline cognitive performance but markedly divergent longitudinal trajectories. SA-like CU individuals showed slower cognitive decline, reduced amyloid-{beta} accumulation, and lower risk of conversion to mild cognitive impairment and AD, reinforcing the ARC signature as a potential early indicator of resilience. Genome-wide association analysis identified CLYBL and FRMD6 as novel genetic modulators associated with these divergent aging phenotypes. Together, our findings position ARC as a sensitive and generalizable biomarker of resilience, enabling early risk stratification and precision prevention for AD.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.