Linguistic evolution minimizes the amount of syntactic hierarchy in grammar
Meloni, C. Y.; Cathcart, C. A.; Ivani, J. K.; Zakharko, T.; Ringen, E. J.; Bickel, B.
Show abstract
A core characteristic of language is the capacity for hierarchical syntax, but it remains debated to what extent languages favor hierarchical structure in their grammars, that is, the extent to which they favor hierarchical structures like "When driving, look ahead!" over concatenations like "You drive, you look ahead!". Through phylogenetic modeling of the grammars of clause combining in three extensive language families (Tupi-Guarani, Sino-Tibetan, and Indo-European), we find an overall bias towards minimizing hierarchy, with significant cultural variation. Our findings suggest that the computational and representational benefits of hierarchical structure tend not to be universally exploited in clause combinations, likely because they come with additional costs for learning. In consequence, the amount of hierarchy in language might differ from what is found in animal communication in a more graded way than commonly assumed.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Adaptive evolution shapes the present-day distribution of the thermal sensitivity of population growth rate 92%
- Primate phylogenomics uncovers multiple rapid radiations and ancient interspecific introgression 91%
- Incomplete recombination suppression fuels extensive haplotype diversity in a butterfly color pattern supergene 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.